Circular relations between climate knowledge and action: A reply to ‘Why do climate negotiations stall? Scientific evidence and solutions for some structural problems’, by Ulrich Frey and Jazmin Burgess

Hannah Hughes

doi:10.1332/204378921X16836997741580

Circular relations between climate knowledge and action: A reply to ‘Why do climate negotiations stall? Scientific evidence and solutions for some structural problems’, by Ulrich Frey and Jazmin Burgess

Hannah Hughes^*

^*Awdur cyfatebol y gwaith hwn

Gwleidyddiaeth Ryngwladol

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Sylwadau/trafodaethau

10 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

Crynodeb

Knowledge and how it informs and supports cooperation in policymaking is a central question within this issue. As Lazarus (2020: 1) quotes at the start of the introduction: [T]he major conclusion in the literature [is] that direct and sustained relationships between researchers and policymakers are the optimal method for promoting the use of research in policy-making. (French, 2019: 163). Frey and Burgess (2022: 4) pick up on the centrality of knowledge in the context of climate negotiations, framing their response around the question of: what scientific evidence is pertinent to improving climate change negotiations and implementation?

Iaith wreiddiol	Saesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)	176-182
Nifer y tudalennau	7
Cyfnodolyn	Global Discourse
Cyfrol	13
Rhif cyhoeddi	2
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar	09 Meh 2023
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)	https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16836997741580 https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16836997741580
Statws	Cyhoeddwyd - 01 Medi 2023

NDC y CU

Mae’r allbwn hwn yn cyfrannu at y Nod(au) Datblygu Cynaliadwy canlynol

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Accepted ManuscriptLlawysgrif awdur wedi’i dderbyn, 271 KBTrwydded: CC BY

Cysylltiad parhaol

Dolen barhaus

Ffeiliau eraill a chysylltiadau

Dolen i’r cyhoeddiad yn Scopus

Ôl bys

Gweld gwybodaeth am bynciau ymchwil 'Circular relations between climate knowledge and action: A reply to ‘Why do climate negotiations stall? Scientific evidence and solutions for some structural problems’, by Ulrich Frey and Jazmin Burgess'. Gyda’i gilydd, maen nhw’n ffurfio ôl bys unigryw.

1 Wrthi'n gweithredu

The politics of science in international climate cooperation
Hughes, H.
Economic and Social Research Council
01 Ion 2022 → 30 Meh 2024
Prosiect: Ymchwil a ariannwyd yn allanol

Dyfynnu hyn

@article{895e01ff192d4110bcb47548a6de6f8f,

title = "Circular relations between climate knowledge and action: A reply to {\textquoteleft}Why do climate negotiations stall? Scientific evidence and solutions for some structural problems{\textquoteright}, by Ulrich Frey and Jazmin Burgess",

abstract = "Knowledge and how it informs and supports cooperation in policymaking is a central question within this issue. As Lazarus (2020: 1) quotes at the start of the introduction: [T]he major conclusion in the literature [is] that direct and sustained relationships between researchers and policymakers are the optimal method for promoting the use of research in policy-making. (French, 2019: 163). Frey and Burgess (2022: 4) pick up on the centrality of knowledge in the context of climate negotiations, framing their response around the question of: what scientific evidence is pertinent to improving climate change negotiations and implementation?",

keywords = "climate knowledge, Global Stocktake, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples Platform, Paris Agreement, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change",

author = "Hannah Hughes",

note = "Funding Information: I acknowledge research funding from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for the project {\textquoteleft}The Politics of Science in International Climate Cooperation{\textquoteright} (ES/W001373/1). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.",

year = "2023",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1332/204378921X16836997741580",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "176--182",

journal = "Global Discourse",

issn = "2326-9995",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

number = "2",

}

Hughes, H 2023, 'Circular relations between climate knowledge and action: A reply to ‘Why do climate negotiations stall? Scientific evidence and solutions for some structural problems’, by Ulrich Frey and Jazmin Burgess', Global Discourse, cyfrol. 13, rhif 2, tt. 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16836997741580, https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16836997741580

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circular relations between climate knowledge and action

T2 - A reply to ‘Why do climate negotiations stall? Scientific evidence and solutions for some structural problems’, by Ulrich Frey and Jazmin Burgess

AU - Hughes, Hannah

N1 - Funding Information: I acknowledge research funding from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for the project ‘The Politics of Science in International Climate Cooperation’ (ES/W001373/1). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.

PY - 2023/9/1

Y1 - 2023/9/1

N2 - Knowledge and how it informs and supports cooperation in policymaking is a central question within this issue. As Lazarus (2020: 1) quotes at the start of the introduction: [T]he major conclusion in the literature [is] that direct and sustained relationships between researchers and policymakers are the optimal method for promoting the use of research in policy-making. (French, 2019: 163). Frey and Burgess (2022: 4) pick up on the centrality of knowledge in the context of climate negotiations, framing their response around the question of: what scientific evidence is pertinent to improving climate change negotiations and implementation?

AB - Knowledge and how it informs and supports cooperation in policymaking is a central question within this issue. As Lazarus (2020: 1) quotes at the start of the introduction: [T]he major conclusion in the literature [is] that direct and sustained relationships between researchers and policymakers are the optimal method for promoting the use of research in policy-making. (French, 2019: 163). Frey and Burgess (2022: 4) pick up on the centrality of knowledge in the context of climate negotiations, framing their response around the question of: what scientific evidence is pertinent to improving climate change negotiations and implementation?

KW - climate knowledge

KW - Global Stocktake

KW - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

KW - Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples Platform

KW - Paris Agreement

KW - United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174281890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1332/204378921X16836997741580

DO - 10.1332/204378921X16836997741580

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85174281890

SN - 2326-9995

VL - 13

SP - 176

EP - 182

JO - Global Discourse

JF - Global Discourse

IS - 2

ER -

Circular relations between climate knowledge and action: A reply to ‘Why do climate negotiations stall? Scientific evidence and solutions for some structural problems’, by Ulrich Frey and Jazmin Burgess

Crynodeb

NDC y CU

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Cysylltiad parhaol

Ffeiliau eraill a chysylltiadau

Ôl bys

Prosiectau

The politics of science in international climate cooperation

Dyfynnu hyn