@article{f38789fe9c36481480308def49d08d81,
title = "Cosmopraxis: Relational methods for a pluriversal IR",
abstract = "Bringing ontological questions back into IR has been key to opening discussions about plurality and difference in terms of the coexistence of related and plural worlds and realities, for example through notions such as relationality and pluriversality. The problem is that in trying to develop relational approaches as an alternative to the 'Western/modern' - atomistic - ontology, relationality, relations, and their meanings can become fixed, translating them into 'things'. The article maintains that cosmopraxis - as a complex pluriversal, multidimensional set of experiences - not only illustrates how relations relate without fixing their meaning, but also provides us with relevant insights to contribute to think of a pluriversal and more plural IR. ",
keywords = "Cosmopraxis, Pluriverse, Relational Methods, Relationality, Worlding",
author = "Amaya Querejazu",
note = "Funding Information: This research is part of the project 'Making Kin with Other Worlds. Relationality as Methodology to Build Pluriversal International Relations' (NIFBA19\190793), financed by the British Academy Newton Fund, as part of my Newton International Fellowship at Aberystwyth University. I would like to thank Navnita C. Behera, Milja Kurki, Giorgio Shani, Arlene B. Tickner, and Tamara Trownsell for their comments and advice. The journal editors and the three anonymous reviewers of the manuscript provided highly appreciated, detailed, and constructive feedback, for which I am sincerely grateful. Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British International Studies Association.",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1017/S0260210521000450",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "875--890",
journal = "Review of International Studies",
issn = "0260-2105",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",
}