TY - JOUR
T1 - Equivalent dose determinations for polymineralic fine-grains using the SAR protocol: application to a Holocene sequence of the Chinese Loess Plateau
AU - Roberts, H. M.
AU - Wintle, Ann G.
N1 - Roberts, H. M., Wintle, A. G. (2001). Equivalent dose determinations for polymineralic fine-grains using the SAR protocol: application to a Holocene sequence of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Quaternary Science Reviews, 20(5-9), 859-863.
PY - 2001/12/1
Y1 - 2001/12/1
N2 - A single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol, involving stimulation of the same disc with an infra-red laser diode followed by blue LEDs, was applied to polymineralic fine-grains. Infra-red stimulated luminescence (IRSL) and (post-IR) optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages are presented for a series of 19 fine-grain (4-11 μm) samples, taken from a loess section (Duowa) in the western Chinese Loess Plateau. There are significant differences between the equivalent doses and, thus, the ages for the IRSL and (post-IR) OSL measurements. Three potential explanations are investigated: incomplete bleaching prior to deposition; thermal transfer of charge; and initial sensitivity change. The question regarding which sequence of ages [IR or (post-IR) OSL] is correct (if either) is not resolved, although the 19 (post-IR) OSL ages yield more consistent results. It is proposed that the 'double' SAR protocol employed may not be correctly monitoring the sensitivity changes relating to either (or both) Natural signals.
AB - A single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol, involving stimulation of the same disc with an infra-red laser diode followed by blue LEDs, was applied to polymineralic fine-grains. Infra-red stimulated luminescence (IRSL) and (post-IR) optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages are presented for a series of 19 fine-grain (4-11 μm) samples, taken from a loess section (Duowa) in the western Chinese Loess Plateau. There are significant differences between the equivalent doses and, thus, the ages for the IRSL and (post-IR) OSL measurements. Three potential explanations are investigated: incomplete bleaching prior to deposition; thermal transfer of charge; and initial sensitivity change. The question regarding which sequence of ages [IR or (post-IR) OSL] is correct (if either) is not resolved, although the 19 (post-IR) OSL ages yield more consistent results. It is proposed that the 'double' SAR protocol employed may not be correctly monitoring the sensitivity changes relating to either (or both) Natural signals.
KW - LUMINESCENCE
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035101730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00051-2
DO - 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00051-2
M3 - Article
SN - 0277-3791
VL - 20
SP - 859
EP - 863
JO - Quaternary Science Reviews
JF - Quaternary Science Reviews
IS - 5-9
ER -