Hunger Strikes: A Prisoner's right or a 'Wicked Folly'?

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Crynodeb

The decision to allow the force-feeding of Ian Brady raises many complex ethical and legal issues. Early case law sanctioned force-feeding, as suicide was illegal. However, this raises the question of whether death by hunger-strike is suicide, or simply an exercise of the right to self- determination. Recent case law provides a mixed message. Some cases recognise the duty of the prison authorities to intervene, others that it is merely a power, whilst a third category emphasises self determination. American case law also fails to give clear guidance on the constitutionality of force-feeding. This article examines the case law, and considers the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the force-feeding of hunger-striking prisoners.
Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)285-296
Nifer y tudalennau12
CyfnodolynHoward Journal of Criminal Justice
Cyfrol40
Rhif cyhoeddi3
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - Awst 2001

Ôl bys

Gweld gwybodaeth am bynciau ymchwil 'Hunger Strikes: A Prisoner's right or a 'Wicked Folly'?'. Gyda’i gilydd, maen nhw’n ffurfio ôl bys unigryw.

Dyfynnu hyn