TY - JOUR
T1 - Hunger Strikes: A Prisoner's right or a 'Wicked Folly'?
AU - Williams, John
N1 - Williams, J. (2001). Hunger Strikes: A Prisoner's right or a 'Wicked Folly'?. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 40 (3), 285-296.
RAE2008
PY - 2001/8
Y1 - 2001/8
N2 - The decision to allow the force-feeding of Ian Brady raises many complex ethical and legal issues. Early case law sanctioned force-feeding, as suicide was illegal. However, this raises the question of whether death by hunger-strike is suicide, or simply an exercise of the right to self- determination. Recent case law provides a mixed message. Some cases recognise the duty of the prison authorities to intervene, others that it is merely a power, whilst a third category emphasises self determination. American case law also fails to give clear guidance on the constitutionality of force-feeding. This article examines the case law, and considers the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the force-feeding of hunger-striking prisoners.
AB - The decision to allow the force-feeding of Ian Brady raises many complex ethical and legal issues. Early case law sanctioned force-feeding, as suicide was illegal. However, this raises the question of whether death by hunger-strike is suicide, or simply an exercise of the right to self- determination. Recent case law provides a mixed message. Some cases recognise the duty of the prison authorities to intervene, others that it is merely a power, whilst a third category emphasises self determination. American case law also fails to give clear guidance on the constitutionality of force-feeding. This article examines the case law, and considers the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the force-feeding of hunger-striking prisoners.
U2 - 10.1111/1468-2311.00208
DO - 10.1111/1468-2311.00208
M3 - Article
SN - 1468-2311
VL - 40
SP - 285
EP - 296
JO - Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
JF - Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
IS - 3
ER -