Crynodeb
The decision to allow the force-feeding of Ian Brady raises many complex ethical and legal issues. Early case law sanctioned force-feeding, as suicide was illegal. However, this raises the question of whether death by hunger-strike is suicide, or simply an exercise of the right to self- determination. Recent case law provides a mixed message. Some cases recognise the duty of the prison authorities to intervene, others that it is merely a power, whilst a third category emphasises self determination. American case law also fails to give clear guidance on the constitutionality of force-feeding. This article examines the case law, and considers the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the force-feeding of hunger-striking prisoners.
| Iaith wreiddiol | Saesneg |
|---|---|
| Tudalennau (o-i) | 285-296 |
| Nifer y tudalennau | 12 |
| Cyfnodolyn | Howard Journal of Crime and Justice |
| Cyfrol | 40 |
| Rhif cyhoeddi | 3 |
| Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs) | |
| Statws | Cyhoeddwyd - Awst 2001 |
NDC y CU
Mae’r allbwn hwn yn cyfrannu at y Nod(au) Datblygu Cynaliadwy canlynol
-
NDC 3 Iechyd a Llesiant Da
Ôl bys
Gweld gwybodaeth am bynciau ymchwil 'Hunger Strikes: A Prisoner's right or a 'Wicked Folly'?'. Gyda’i gilydd, maen nhw’n ffurfio ôl bys unigryw.Dyfynnu hyn
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver