Knowing and Judging in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Reflexive Challenge

Inanna Hamati-Ataya

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

18 Dyfyniadau(SciVal)
252 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

Crynodeb

This article addresses the notion of reflexivity in international theory through an attempt to transcend the dichotomy between knowledge and judgement. It intends to demonstrate that neither ‘philosophical’ nor ‘scientific’ approaches to world politics can reconcile cognitive and evaluative claims, but that such an endeavour may be envisaged within a certain conception of knowledge, science and facts. A comparison of Morton Kaplan's approach with Hans Morgenthau's and Kenneth Waltz's suggests what kind of theoretical alternatives can bring together these two seemingly incommensurable orders of discourse under a unified, foundationally reflexive epistemology.
Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)1079-1101
CyfnodolynReview of International Studies
Cyfrol36
Rhif cyhoeddi4
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar14 Gorff 2010
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - Hyd 2010

Ôl bys

Gweld gwybodaeth am bynciau ymchwil 'Knowing and Judging in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Reflexive Challenge'. Gyda’i gilydd, maen nhw’n ffurfio ôl bys unigryw.

Dyfynnu hyn