TY - JOUR
T1 - Perennial biomass cropping and use
T2 - Shaping the policy ecosystem in European countries
AU - Clifton‐Brown, John
AU - Hastings, Astley
AU - von Cossel, Moritz
AU - Murphy-Bokern, Donal
AU - McCalmont, Jon
AU - Whittaker, Jeanette
AU - Alexopoulou, Efi
AU - Amaducci, Stefano
AU - Andronic, Larisa
AU - Ashman, Christopher
AU - Awty‐Carroll, Danny
AU - Bhatia, Rakesh
AU - Breuer, Lutz
AU - Cosentino, Salvatore
AU - Cracroft‐Eley, William
AU - Donnison, Iain
AU - Elbersen, Berien
AU - Ferrarini, Andrea
AU - Ford, Judith
AU - Greef, Jörg
AU - Ingram, Julie
AU - Lewandowski, Iris
AU - Magenau, Elena
AU - Mos, Michal
AU - Petrick, Martin
AU - Pogrzeba, Marta
AU - Robson, Paul
AU - Rowe, Rebecca L.
AU - Sandu, Anatolii
AU - Schwarz, Kai-Uwe
AU - Scordia, Danilo
AU - Scurlock, Jonathan
AU - Shepherd, Anita
AU - Thornton, Judith
AU - Trindade, Luisa M.
AU - Vetter, Sylvia
AU - Wagner, Moritz
AU - Wu, Pei‐Chen
AU - Yamada, Toshihiko
AU - Kiesel, Andreas
N1 - Funding Information:
This research received funding from the European Union's Bio‐based Industries Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 745012 (GRACE) and Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 727698 (MAGIC). The UK authors also thank EPSRC, BBSRC, Defra and UK Supergen Bioenergy Hub (EP/S000771/1) funding ref. RG15855—UKRI (EPSRC), BBSRC (BB/V011553/1) for the Perennial Biomass Crops for Greenhouse Gas Removal (PBC4GGR) demonstrator project and was also undertaken as part of the UK Energy Research Centre research programme (UKERC‐4, EP/S029575/1), Judith Ford's contribution was supported by EPSRC EP/L014912/1 and The United Bank of Carbon. LB and MP acknowledge funding of the SDG Network (Grant No. 57526248) funded by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) from funds of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation (BMZ) in the frame of the program ‘exceed—Hochschulexzellenz in der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit’. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. nexus
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. GCB Bioenergy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/4/10
Y1 - 2023/4/10
N2 - Demand for sustainably produced biomass is expected to increase with the need to provide renewable commodities, improve resource security and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with COP26 commitments. Studies have demonstrated additional environmental benefits of using perennial biomass crops (PBCs), when produced appropriately, as a feedstock for the growing bioeconomy, including utilisation for bioenergy (with or without carbon capture and storage). PBCs can potentially contribute to Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) (2023–27) objectives provided they are carefully integrated into farming systems and landscapes. Despite significant research and development (R&D) investment over decades in herbaceous and coppiced woody PBCs, deployment has largely stagnated due to social, economic and policy uncertainties. This paper identifies the challenges in creating policies that are acceptable to all actors. Development will need to be informed by measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of greenhouse gas emissions reductions and other environmental, economic and social metrics. It discusses interlinked issues that must be considered in the expansion of PBC production: (i) available land; (ii) yield potential; (iii) integration into farming systems; (iv) R&D requirements; (v) utilisation options; and (vi) market systems and the socio-economic environment. It makes policy recommendations that would enable greater PBC deployment: (1) incentivise farmers and land managers through specific policy measures, including carbon pricing, to allocate their less productive and less profitable land for uses which deliver demonstrable greenhouse gas reductions; (2) enable greenhouse gas mitigation markets to develop and offer secure contracts for commercial developers of verifiable low-carbon bioenergy and bioproducts; (3) support innovation in biomass utilisation value chains; and (4) continue long-term, strategic R&D and education for positive environmental, economic and social sustainability impacts.
AB - Demand for sustainably produced biomass is expected to increase with the need to provide renewable commodities, improve resource security and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with COP26 commitments. Studies have demonstrated additional environmental benefits of using perennial biomass crops (PBCs), when produced appropriately, as a feedstock for the growing bioeconomy, including utilisation for bioenergy (with or without carbon capture and storage). PBCs can potentially contribute to Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) (2023–27) objectives provided they are carefully integrated into farming systems and landscapes. Despite significant research and development (R&D) investment over decades in herbaceous and coppiced woody PBCs, deployment has largely stagnated due to social, economic and policy uncertainties. This paper identifies the challenges in creating policies that are acceptable to all actors. Development will need to be informed by measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of greenhouse gas emissions reductions and other environmental, economic and social metrics. It discusses interlinked issues that must be considered in the expansion of PBC production: (i) available land; (ii) yield potential; (iii) integration into farming systems; (iv) R&D requirements; (v) utilisation options; and (vi) market systems and the socio-economic environment. It makes policy recommendations that would enable greater PBC deployment: (1) incentivise farmers and land managers through specific policy measures, including carbon pricing, to allocate their less productive and less profitable land for uses which deliver demonstrable greenhouse gas reductions; (2) enable greenhouse gas mitigation markets to develop and offer secure contracts for commercial developers of verifiable low-carbon bioenergy and bioproducts; (3) support innovation in biomass utilisation value chains; and (4) continue long-term, strategic R&D and education for positive environmental, economic and social sustainability impacts.
KW - BECCS
KW - bioeconomy value chains
KW - biomass utilisation
KW - circular economy
KW - energy security
KW - farm subsidies
KW - food security
KW - integration into farm business
KW - land availability
KW - policy recommendation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150663821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.13038
DO - 10.1111/gcbb.13038
M3 - Review article
SN - 1757-1693
VL - 15
SP - 538
EP - 558
JO - GCB Bioenergy
JF - GCB Bioenergy
IS - 5
ER -