TY - JOUR
T1 - Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors using Bayesian kernel-based methods
AU - Van Calster, Ben
AU - Timmerman, Dirk
AU - Lu, Chuan
AU - Suykens, Johan A. K.
AU - Valentin, Lil
AU - Van Holsbeke, Caroline
AU - Amant, Frédéric
AU - Vergote, Ignace
AU - Van Huffel, Sabine
N1 - B. Van Calster, D. Timmerman, C. Lu, J.A.K. Suykens, L. Valentin, C. Van Holsbeke, F. Amant, I. Vergote, S. Van Huffel. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors using Bayesian kernel-based methods, Untrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 29, no. 5, 2007, pp. 496-504.
Sponsorship: BIOPATTERN, eTUMOR, MetRO
PY - 2007/5
Y1 - 2007/5
N2 - Objectives
To develop flexible classifiers that predict malignancy in adnexal masses using a large database from nine centers.
Methods
The database consisted of 1066 patients with at least one persistent adnexal mass for which a large amount of clinical and ultrasound data were recorded. The outcome of interest was the histological classification of the adnexal mass as benign or malignant. The outcome was predicted using Bayesian least squares support vector machines in comparison with relevance vector machines. The models were developed on a training set (n = 754) and tested on a test set (n = 312).
Results
Twenty-five percent of the patients (n = 266) had a malignant tumor. Variable selection resulted in a set of 12 variables for the models: age, maximal diameter of the ovary, maximal diameter of the solid component, personal history of ovarian cancer, hormonal therapy, very strong intratumoral blood flow (i.e. color score 4), ascites, presumed ovarian origin of tumor, multilocular-solid tumor, blood flow within papillary projections, irregular internal cyst wall and acoustic shadows. Test set area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) for all models exceeded 0.940, with a sensitivity above 90% and a specificity above 80% for all models. The least squares support vector machine model with linear kernel performed very well, with an AUC of 0.946, 91% sensitivity and 84% specificity. The models performed well in the test sets of all the centers.
Conclusions
Bayesian kernel-based methods can accurately separate malignant from benign masses. The robustness of the models will be investigated in future studies.
AB - Objectives
To develop flexible classifiers that predict malignancy in adnexal masses using a large database from nine centers.
Methods
The database consisted of 1066 patients with at least one persistent adnexal mass for which a large amount of clinical and ultrasound data were recorded. The outcome of interest was the histological classification of the adnexal mass as benign or malignant. The outcome was predicted using Bayesian least squares support vector machines in comparison with relevance vector machines. The models were developed on a training set (n = 754) and tested on a test set (n = 312).
Results
Twenty-five percent of the patients (n = 266) had a malignant tumor. Variable selection resulted in a set of 12 variables for the models: age, maximal diameter of the ovary, maximal diameter of the solid component, personal history of ovarian cancer, hormonal therapy, very strong intratumoral blood flow (i.e. color score 4), ascites, presumed ovarian origin of tumor, multilocular-solid tumor, blood flow within papillary projections, irregular internal cyst wall and acoustic shadows. Test set area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) for all models exceeded 0.940, with a sensitivity above 90% and a specificity above 80% for all models. The least squares support vector machine model with linear kernel performed very well, with an AUC of 0.946, 91% sensitivity and 84% specificity. The models performed well in the test sets of all the centers.
Conclusions
Bayesian kernel-based methods can accurately separate malignant from benign masses. The robustness of the models will be investigated in future studies.
KW - Bayesian evidence framework
KW - least squares support vector machines
KW - logistic regression
KW - ovarian tumor classification
KW - relevance vector machines
KW - ultrasound
U2 - 10.1002/uog.3996
DO - 10.1002/uog.3996
M3 - Article
C2 - 17444557
SN - 1469-0705
VL - 29
SP - 496
EP - 504
JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 5
ER -