Crynodeb
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of serendipity and approaches to its study particularly in relation to information studies.
Design/methodology/approach – The origins of the term serendipity are described and its elaboration as an exploratory and explanatory concept in science and the social sciences are outlined. The distinction between serendipity and serendipity pattern is explained and theoretical and empirical studies of both serendipity and the serendipity patterns are explored. The relationship between information encountering is described. Empirical studies of serendipity using Citation Classics and other research approaches in information studies are described.
Findings – The discrepancy between occurrences of serendipity in studies using Citation Classics and reported serendipity in philosophy of science, research anecdotes, information encountering and information seeking by inter-disciplinary researchers is highlighted. A comparison between a process
model of serendipity and serendipity as an emergent behavioural characteristic are indicates directions for future research.
Originality/value – The paper provides and original synthesis of the theoretical and empirical literature on serendipity with particular reference to work in information studies and an indication of the methodological difficulties involved in its study.
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of serendipity and approaches to its study particularly in relation to information studies.
Design/methodology/approach – The origins of the term serendipity are described and its elaboration as an exploratory and explanatory concept in science and the social sciences are outlined. The distinction between serendipity and serendipity pattern is explained and theoretical and empirical studies of both serendipity and the serendipity patterns are explored. The relationship between information encountering is described. Empirical studies of serendipity using Citation Classics and other research approaches in information studies are described.
Findings – The discrepancy between occurrences of serendipity in studies using Citation Classics and reported serendipity in philosophy of science, research anecdotes, information encountering and information seeking by inter-disciplinary researchers is highlighted. A comparison between a process
model of serendipity and serendipity as an emergent behavioural characteristic are indicates directions for future research.
Originality/value – The paper provides and original synthesis of the theoretical and empirical literature on serendipity with particular reference to work in information studies and an indication of the methodological difficulties involved in its study.
| Iaith wreiddiol | Saesneg |
|---|---|
| Tudalennau (o-i) | 1015 - 1038 |
| Cyfnodolyn | Journal of Documentation |
| Cyfrol | 70 |
| Rhif cyhoeddi | 6 |
| Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs) | |
| Statws | Cyhoeddwyd - 10 Hyd 2014 |
Ôl bys
Gweld gwybodaeth am bynciau ymchwil 'Serendipity and its study'. Gyda’i gilydd, maen nhw’n ffurfio ôl bys unigryw.Proffiliau
-
Qualitative Code Book: For Foster’s Nonlinear Model of Information Behaviour
Foster, A. & Urquhart, C., 21 Tach 2011, Prifysgol Aberystwyth | Aberystwyth University.Allbwn ymchwil: Papur gweithio
Mynediad agoredFfeil -
Validating coding for a theoretical model of information behaviour
Foster, A., 09 Medi 2008.Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gynhadledd › Papur › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
Dyfynnu hyn
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver