The Anthropocene is best understood as an ongoing, intensifying, diachronous event

  • Michael J. C. Walker
  • , Andrew M. Bauer
  • , Matthew Edgeworth
  • , Erle C. Ellis
  • , Stanley C. Finney
  • , Philip L. Gibbard*
  • , Mark Maslin
  • *Awdur cyfatebol y gwaith hwn

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

20 Dyfyniadau (Scopus)
9 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

Crynodeb

Current debate on the status and character of the Anthropocene is focussed on whether this interval of geological time should be designated as a formal unit of epoch/series rank in the International Chronostratigraphic Chart/Geological Time Scale, or whether it is more appropriate for it to be considered as an informal ‘event’ comparable in significance with other major transformative events in deeper geological time. The case for formalizing the Anthropocene as a chronostratigraphical unit with a base at approximately 1950 CE is being developed by the Anthropocene Working Group of the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy. Here we outline the alternative position and explain why the time‐transgressive nature of human impact on global environmental systems that is reflected in the recent stratigraphical record means that the Anthropocene is better seen not as a series/epoch with a fixed lower boundary, but rather as an unfolding, transforming and intensifying geological event.
Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Nifer y tudalennau3
CyfnodolynBoreas
Cyfrol53
Rhif cyhoeddi1
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar08 Hyd 2023
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - 31 Ion 2024

Ôl bys

Gweld gwybodaeth am bynciau ymchwil 'The Anthropocene is best understood as an ongoing, intensifying, diachronous event'. Gyda’i gilydd, maen nhw’n ffurfio ôl bys unigryw.

Dyfynnu hyn