Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Hayley S. Clements*
  • , Reinette Biggs
  • , Alta De Vos
  • , Emmanuel Do Linh San
  • , Gareth P. Hempson
  • , Birthe Linden
  • , Bryan Maritz
  • , Ara Monadjem
  • , Chevonne Reynolds
  • , Frances Siebert
  • , Nicola Stevens
  • , Matthew Child
  • , Enrico Di Minin
  • , Karen J. Esler
  • , Maike Hamann
  • , Ty Loft
  • , Belinda Reyers
  • , Odirilwe Selomane
  • , Geethen Singh
  • , Andrew L. Skowno
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Stellenbosch University
  • University of Helsinki
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre
  • Rhodes University
  • Sol Plaatje University
  • University of the Witwatersrand
  • University of Glasgow
  • University of Venda
  • University of the Western Cape
  • University of Eswatini
  • University of Pretoria
  • North-West University
  • University of Oxford
  • South African National Biodiversity Institute
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • University of Exeter
  • South African Environmental Observation Network
  • University of Cape Town

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Maintaining biodiversity is central to the sustainable development agenda1. However, a lack of context-specific biodiversity information at policy-relevant scales has posed major limitations to decision-makers2,3. To address this challenge, we undertook a comprehensive assessment of the biodiversity intactness of sub-Saharan Africa4 using place-based knowledge of 200 African biodiversity experts5. We estimate that the region has on average lost 24% of its pre-colonial and pre-industrial faunal and floral population abundances, ranging from losses of <20% for disturbance-adapted herbaceous plants to 80% for some large mammals. Rwanda and Nigeria are the least intact (<55%), whereas Namibia and Botswana are the most intact (>85%). Notably, most remaining organisms occur in unprotected, relatively untransformed rangelands and natural forests. Losses in biodiversity intactness in the worst-affected biomes are driven by land transformation into cropland in grasslands and fynbos (Mediterranean-type ecosystems), by non-agricultural degradation in forests and by a combination of the two drivers in savannas. This assessment provides decision-makers with multifaceted, contextually appropriate and policy-relevant information on the state of biodiversity in an understudied region of the world. Our approach could be used in other regions, including better-studied localities, to integrate contextual, place-based knowledge into multiscale assessments of biodiversity status and impacts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-121
Number of pages27
JournalNature
Volume649
Issue number8095
Early online date03 Dec 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Africa South of the Sahara
  • Animals
  • Conservation of Natural Resources
  • Forests
  • Grassland
  • Sustainable Development
  • Agriculture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this