TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11 x MIR162 x 1507 x GA21 and three subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2010-86)
AU - European Food Safety Authority Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms
AU - Naegeli, Hanspeter
AU - Birch, Andrew Nicholas
AU - Casacuberta, Josep
AU - De Schrijver, Adinda
AU - Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni
AU - Guerche, Philippe
AU - Jones, Huw
AU - Manachini, Barbara
AU - Messéan, Antoine
AU - Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen
AU - Nogué, Fabien
AU - Robaglia, Christophe
AU - Rostoks, Nils
AU - Sweet, Jeremy
AU - Tebbe, Christoph
AU - Visioli, Francesco
AU - Ardizzone, Michele
AU - Federici, Silvia
AU - Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
AU - Gennaro, Andrea
AU - Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
AU - Lanzoni, Anna
AU - Neri, Franco Maria
AU - Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
AU - Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
PY - 2018/7/25
Y1 - 2018/7/25
N2 - In this opinion, the GMO Panel assessed the four-event stack maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 and three of its subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and seven of their combinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events or the seven subcombinations leading to modification of the original conclusions were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single events in the four-event stack maize did not give rise to food/feed safety issues. Based on the nutritional assessment of the compositional characteristics of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21, foods and feeds derived from the genetically modified (GM) maize are expected to have the same nutritional impact as those derived from non-GM maize varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to and as safe as its non-GM comparator in the context of the scope of this application. For the three subcombinations included in the scope, for which no experimental data were provided, the GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events and concluded that their combinations would not raise safety concerns. These maize subcombinations are therefore expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 and its subcombinations. A minority opinion expressed by a GMO Panel member is appended to this opinion.
AB - In this opinion, the GMO Panel assessed the four-event stack maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 and three of its subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and seven of their combinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events or the seven subcombinations leading to modification of the original conclusions were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single events in the four-event stack maize did not give rise to food/feed safety issues. Based on the nutritional assessment of the compositional characteristics of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21, foods and feeds derived from the genetically modified (GM) maize are expected to have the same nutritional impact as those derived from non-GM maize varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to and as safe as its non-GM comparator in the context of the scope of this application. For the three subcombinations included in the scope, for which no experimental data were provided, the GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events and concluded that their combinations would not raise safety concerns. These maize subcombinations are therefore expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 and its subcombinations. A minority opinion expressed by a GMO Panel member is appended to this opinion.
KW - 1507
KW - Bt11
KW - GA21
KW - GMO
KW - insect resistant and herbicide tolerant
KW - maize (Zea mays)
KW - MIR162
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062227000&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5309
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5309
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062227000
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 16
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 7
M1 - e05309
ER -