TY - JOUR
T1 - Celebrations amongst challenges
T2 - Considering the past, present and future of the qualitative methods in psychology section of the British Psychology Society
AU - Riley, Sarah
AU - Brooks, Joanna
AU - Goodman, Simon
AU - Cahill, Sharon
AU - Branney, Peter
AU - Treharne, Gareth
AU - Sullivan, Cath
N1 - Funding Information:
QMiP currently operates as a Section of the BPS within a wider context of positive indicators for qualitative research. Qualitative research receives research council funding, and in health settings incorporating patient views is valued by those developing policies and initiatives, so that by 2017 12.9% of research funded by the UK National Institute for Health’s Research for Patient Benefit programme had qualitative methods as their primary method. Syntheses of qualitative research are also influencing healthcare interventions and services (e.g., Finfgeld-Connett 2016); the UK Medical Research Council guidance on developing complex interventions state the need for both qualitative and quantitative evidence (Craig et al. 2008); and standard operating procedures for using qualitative methods to support randomised control trials now exist (Rapport et al. 2013). These examples demonstrate the growing understanding that presenting metrics without consideration of contextual factors or explanatory narrative is not good research practice.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2019/7/3
Y1 - 2019/7/3
N2 - This article summarises the standpoint of the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society regarding the current position of qualitative research in psychology in the United Kingdom. The article is in three parts. Part one documents the historical development of the section, outlining its rationale, remit, and current activities. These activities aim to champion and develop qualitative methods in psychology, supporting high quality work regardless of epistemological or ontological position. Part two considers the current context of our work, describing not only how qualitative methods are valued in the United Kingdom but also how this recognition is undermined, particularly through the operationalisation of our national research assessment (the Research Excellence Framework). We also consider the challenges that Open Science poses for qualitive researchers. Part three highlights some of the significant contributions of UK-based qualitative researchers to psychology, with a particular focus on feminist-informed research, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis, before pointing to future exciting possibilities based on research exploring the affordances of digital technologies and innovative synthesising across epistemologies and disciplinary boundaries.
AB - This article summarises the standpoint of the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society regarding the current position of qualitative research in psychology in the United Kingdom. The article is in three parts. Part one documents the historical development of the section, outlining its rationale, remit, and current activities. These activities aim to champion and develop qualitative methods in psychology, supporting high quality work regardless of epistemological or ontological position. Part two considers the current context of our work, describing not only how qualitative methods are valued in the United Kingdom but also how this recognition is undermined, particularly through the operationalisation of our national research assessment (the Research Excellence Framework). We also consider the challenges that Open Science poses for qualitive researchers. Part three highlights some of the significant contributions of UK-based qualitative researchers to psychology, with a particular focus on feminist-informed research, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis, before pointing to future exciting possibilities based on research exploring the affordances of digital technologies and innovative synthesising across epistemologies and disciplinary boundaries.
KW - British Psychological Society
KW - Open Science
KW - QMiP
KW - Research Excellence Framework
KW - United Kingdom
KW - qualitative methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066408159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275
DO - 10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275
M3 - Article
SN - 1478-0887
VL - 16
SP - 464
EP - 482
JO - Qualitative Research in Psychology
JF - Qualitative Research in Psychology
IS - 3
ER -