Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment

Izzati Muhimmah; Arnau Oliver; Erika R. E. Denton; Josep Pont; Elsa Pérez; Reyer Zwiggelaar

doi:10.1007/11783237_55

Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment

Izzati Muhimmah, Arnau Oliver, Erika R. E. Denton, Josep Pont, Elsa Pérez, Reyer Zwiggelaar

Department of Computer Science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Proceeding (Non-Journal item)

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mammographic risk assessment provides an indication of the likelihood of women developing breast cancer. A number of mammographic image based classification methods have been developed, such as Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár based assessment. We provide a comparative study of these four approaches. Results on the full MIAS database are presented, which indicate strong correlation (Spearman's > 0.9) between Wolfe, Boyd and BI-RADS based classification, whilst the correlation with Tabár based classification is less straight forward (Spearman's < 0.5, but low correlations mainly caused by one of the classes).

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Digital Mammography - 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Proceedings
Subtitle of host publication	8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Manchester, UK, June 18-21, 2006, Proceedings
Publisher	Springer Nature
Pages	407-415
Number of pages	9
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-540-35627-1
ISBN (Print)	3540356258, 9783540356257
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_55
Publication status	Published - 21 Jun 2006

Publication series

Name	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume	4046 LNCS
ISSN (Print)	0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)	1611-3349

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/11783237_55

Permanent link

Persistent link

Cite this

Muhimmah, I., Oliver, A., Denton, E. R. E., Pont, J., Pérez, E., & Zwiggelaar, R. (2006). Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment. In Digital Mammography - 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Proceedings: 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Manchester, UK, June 18-21, 2006, Proceedings (pp. 407-415). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 4046 LNCS). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_55

Muhimmah, Izzati ; Oliver, Arnau ; Denton, Erika R. E. et al. / Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment. Digital Mammography - 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Proceedings: 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Manchester, UK, June 18-21, 2006, Proceedings. Springer Nature, 2006. pp. 407-415 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).

@inproceedings{7312cb0f82234d1ea89c8412b94d1417,

title = "Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tab{\'a}r Based Mammographic Risk Assessment",

abstract = "Mammographic risk assessment provides an indication of the likelihood of women developing breast cancer. A number of mammographic image based classification methods have been developed, such as Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tab{\'a}r based assessment. We provide a comparative study of these four approaches. Results on the full MIAS database are presented, which indicate strong correlation (Spearman's > 0.9) between Wolfe, Boyd and BI-RADS based classification, whilst the correlation with Tab{\'a}r based classification is less straight forward (Spearman's < 0.5, but low correlations mainly caused by one of the classes).",

author = "Izzati Muhimmah and Arnau Oliver and Denton, {Erika R. E.} and Josep Pont and Elsa P{\'e}rez and Reyer Zwiggelaar",

year = "2006",

month = jun,

day = "21",

doi = "10.1007/11783237_55",

language = "English",

isbn = "3540356258",

series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

pages = "407--415",

booktitle = "Digital Mammography - 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Proceedings",

address = "Switzerland",

}

Muhimmah, I, Oliver, A, Denton, ERE, Pont, J, Pérez, E & Zwiggelaar, R 2006, Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment. in Digital Mammography - 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Proceedings: 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Manchester, UK, June 18-21, 2006, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 4046 LNCS, Springer Nature, pp. 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_55

Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment. / Muhimmah, Izzati; Oliver, Arnau; Denton, Erika R. E. et al.
Digital Mammography - 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Proceedings: 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Manchester, UK, June 18-21, 2006, Proceedings. Springer Nature, 2006. p. 407-415 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 4046 LNCS).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Proceeding (Non-Journal item)

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment

AU - Muhimmah, Izzati

AU - Oliver, Arnau

AU - Denton, Erika R. E.

AU - Pont, Josep

AU - Pérez, Elsa

AU - Zwiggelaar, Reyer

PY - 2006/6/21

Y1 - 2006/6/21

N2 - Mammographic risk assessment provides an indication of the likelihood of women developing breast cancer. A number of mammographic image based classification methods have been developed, such as Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár based assessment. We provide a comparative study of these four approaches. Results on the full MIAS database are presented, which indicate strong correlation (Spearman's > 0.9) between Wolfe, Boyd and BI-RADS based classification, whilst the correlation with Tabár based classification is less straight forward (Spearman's < 0.5, but low correlations mainly caused by one of the classes).

AB - Mammographic risk assessment provides an indication of the likelihood of women developing breast cancer. A number of mammographic image based classification methods have been developed, such as Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár based assessment. We provide a comparative study of these four approaches. Results on the full MIAS database are presented, which indicate strong correlation (Spearman's > 0.9) between Wolfe, Boyd and BI-RADS based classification, whilst the correlation with Tabár based classification is less straight forward (Spearman's < 0.5, but low correlations mainly caused by one of the classes).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746378210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/11783237_55

DO - 10.1007/11783237_55

M3 - Conference Proceeding (Non-Journal item)

SN - 3540356258

SN - 9783540356257

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 407

EP - 415

BT - Digital Mammography - 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Proceedings

PB - Springer Nature

ER -

Muhimmah I, Oliver A, Denton ERE, Pont J, Pérez E, Zwiggelaar R. Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment. In Digital Mammography - 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Proceedings: 8th International Workshop, IWDM 2006, Manchester, UK, June 18-21, 2006, Proceedings. Springer Nature. 2006. p. 407-415. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). doi: 10.1007/11783237_55

Comparison Between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabár Based Mammographic Risk Assessment

Abstract

Publication series

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Permanent link

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this