Comparison of Methods for Combining Evidence for Spiculated Lesions

Tim Parr, Reyer Zwiggelaar, Sue Astley, Caroline Boggis, Christopher J. Taylor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Breast cancer is a leading cause of fatality in women, with approximately 1 in 12 women affected by the disease during their lifetime [1], Mass screening of women using x-ray mammography is currently the most effective method of early detection of the disease; this is essential for successful treatment [2].
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDigital Mammography
Subtitle of host publicationNijmegen, 1998
EditorsNico Karssemeijer, Martin Thijssen, Jan Hendriks, Leon Erning
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages71-78
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)978-94-011-5318-8
ISBN (Print)978-0-7923-5274-7, 978-94-010-6234-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 1998
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameComputational Imaging and Vision
PublisherSpringer Nature
Volume13
ISSN (Print)1381-6446

Keywords

  • classification
  • diagnosis
  • image processing
  • imaging
  • imaging techniques
  • performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Methods for Combining Evidence for Spiculated Lesions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this