Abstract
This paper uses novel electronic tools to identify the degree to which Australia was listening to Indigenous peoples in a ‘national conversation’ about constitutional recognition between 2015 and late 2017. The results show that while there was a superficial overlap in themes, there were important differences of framing. Recognition remained a largely formal, elite and non-Indigenous concern, with First Nations focusing on treaties, sovereignty, listening and respect. Interaction was noticeably aggressive, but not exclusively so. Non-Indigenous people avoided discussing racism, and talked more frequently about history, framing issues in the past tense; First Nations talked about the here and now. And despite more focus on everyday racism, Indigenous peoples were consistently more positive and proud, rejecting ‘plight’ constructions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 17-40 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 06 Dec 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Jan 2022 |
Keywords
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
- big data
- Constitutional recognition
- democracy
- Indigenous politics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Did Australia listen to Indigenous people on constitutional recognition? A big data analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver