TY - JOUR
T1 - Discussion on ‘Acheulian and Tephra from Upland Western Maharashtra, (Deccan Volcanic Province), Peninsular India’, by Deo et al. 2021 (SP 515)
AU - Pearce, Nicholas J.G.
AU - Gatti, Emma
AU - Achyuthan, Hema
N1 - Funding Information:
Author contributions NJGP: conceptualization (lead), investigation (lead), writing – original draft (lead); EG: conceptualization (supporting), investigation (equal), writing – review & editing (equal); HA: conceptualization (equal), investigation (equal), writing – review & editing (supporting) Funding Funding for much of the analytical work presented here was provided to Prof. John Westgate (University of Toronto) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada which is gratefully acknowledged. EG thanks the Domestic Research Scholarship and the Cambridge European Trust for funding her PhD, and the Cambridge-India Partnership Fund and the SMUTS Memorial Fund for sponsoring fieldwork at Bori and Morgaon during 2009 and 2010.
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Acheulean artefacts are widely known from archaeological complexes in India and commonly comprise handaxes, picks and cleavers. These provide information on human occupation and evolution across India, and have been the subject of much research on stone technology. In some of these sites, artefacts are associated with a Pleistocene volcanic ash layer derived from the Toba caldera in Sumatra, but various studies have derived a wide range of ages from this deposit leading to differing schools of thought as to the age of the tephra. Recent trace element, fission track and mineralogical studies (since 2011), have enabled accurate recognition of each Toba eruptive unit across their fall out, but these approaches continue to be overlooked in some studies where artefacts and Toba tephra co-exist in India. This leads to significant errors in tephra identification, and thus hampers any derived age interpretations. Most recently, this includes the study by Deo et al. (2021) who, in Geological Society Special Publication 515 (Tiwari et al. 2021) report ages for artefacts and tephra from two sites in the Deccan Volcanic Province which have become pivotal in many arguments, namely Morgaon and Bori. Here we address these issues and reiterate the methods for identification of the three main Toba tephra deposits.
AB - Acheulean artefacts are widely known from archaeological complexes in India and commonly comprise handaxes, picks and cleavers. These provide information on human occupation and evolution across India, and have been the subject of much research on stone technology. In some of these sites, artefacts are associated with a Pleistocene volcanic ash layer derived from the Toba caldera in Sumatra, but various studies have derived a wide range of ages from this deposit leading to differing schools of thought as to the age of the tephra. Recent trace element, fission track and mineralogical studies (since 2011), have enabled accurate recognition of each Toba eruptive unit across their fall out, but these approaches continue to be overlooked in some studies where artefacts and Toba tephra co-exist in India. This leads to significant errors in tephra identification, and thus hampers any derived age interpretations. Most recently, this includes the study by Deo et al. (2021) who, in Geological Society Special Publication 515 (Tiwari et al. 2021) report ages for artefacts and tephra from two sites in the Deccan Volcanic Province which have become pivotal in many arguments, namely Morgaon and Bori. Here we address these issues and reiterate the methods for identification of the three main Toba tephra deposits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129542704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1144/jgs2021-120
DO - 10.1144/jgs2021-120
M3 - Comment/Debate
AN - SCOPUS:85129542704
SN - 0016-7649
VL - 179
JO - Journal of the Geological Society
JF - Journal of the Geological Society
IS - 3
M1 - jgs2021-120
ER -