Distribution, dis-sumption and dis-appointment: The negative geographies of city logistics

Samuel Mutter*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critical approaches to logistics, in dialogue with geography and related disciplines, have exposed the turbulence behind apparently seamless transnational circulations of stuff. As everyday urban life becomes increasingly structured through logistical practices and expectations which imbricate consumption and distribution, now is an appropriate moment to take stock of these dialogues. Reviewing them, the article identifies three spatial assumptions – peripheral geographies, seamless consumption, forward motion – proposing that they express an additive, forward-leaning representation of logistics. In response, it draws upon debates on ‘negativity’ to suggest geographers pay greater attention to logistics’ negative spaces (voids), affects (dis-appointments) and mobilities (reversals).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-177
Number of pages18
JournalProgress in Human Geography
Volume47
Issue number1
Early online date12 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • affect
  • city logistics
  • dis-sumption
  • everyday life
  • mobilities
  • negative geographies
  • platform urbanism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distribution, dis-sumption and dis-appointment: The negative geographies of city logistics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this