TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the sensitivity of the bovine BCG challenge model using a prime boost Ad85A vaccine regimen
AU - Biffar, Lucia
AU - Blunt, Laura
AU - Atkins, William
AU - Anderson, Paul
AU - Holder, Tom
AU - Xing, Zhou
AU - Vordermeier, Hans-Martin
AU - McShane, Helen
AU - Villarreal-Ramos, Bernardo
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank all members of the Animal Services Unit, especially Timm Konold for their exemplary care of all animals used in these experiments. The authors also wish to acknowledge the contribution of Roland Ashford in critically reviewing the paper. This work was supported by the National Centre of the 3 Rs (NC3Rs strategic award number NC/M001997/1). Appendix A
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank all members of the Animal Services Unit, especially Timm Konold for their exemplary care of all animals used in these experiments. The authors also wish to acknowledge the contribution of Roland Ashford in critically reviewing the paper. This work was supported by the National Centre of the 3 Rs (NC3Rs strategic award number NC/M001997/1).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2020/1/29
Y1 - 2020/1/29
N2 - In the absence of biomarkers of protective immunity, newly developed vaccines against bovine tuberculosis need to be evaluated in virulent Mycobacterium bovis challenge experiments, which require the use of expensive and highly in demand Biological Safety Level 3 (BSL3) animal facilities. The recently developed bovine BCG challenge model offers a cheaper and faster way to test new vaccine candidates and additionally reduces the severity of the challenge compared to virulent M. bovis challenge in line with the remits of the NC3Rs. In this work we sought to establish the sensitivity of the BCG challenge model by testing a prime boost vaccine regimen that previously increased protection over BCG alone against M. bovis challenge. All animals, except the control group, were vaccinated subcutaneously with BCG Danish, and half of those were then boosted with a recombinant adenoviral vector expressing Antigen 85A, Ad85A. All animals were challenged with BCG Tokyo into the prescapular lymph node and the bacterial load within the lymph nodes was established. All vaccinated animals, independent of the vaccination regimen, cleared BCG significantly faster from the lymph node than control animals, suggesting a protective effect. There was however, no difference between the BCG and the BCG-Ad85A regimens. Additionally, we analysed humoral and cellular immune responses taken prior to challenge for possible predictors of protection. Cultured ELISpot identified significantly higher IFN-ɣ responses in protected vaccinated animals, relative to controls, but not in unprotected vaccinated animals. Furthermore, a trend for protected animals to produce more IFN-ɣ by quantitative PCR and intracellular staining was observed. Thus, this model can also be an attractive alternative to M. bovis challenge models for the discovery of protective biomarkers
AB - In the absence of biomarkers of protective immunity, newly developed vaccines against bovine tuberculosis need to be evaluated in virulent Mycobacterium bovis challenge experiments, which require the use of expensive and highly in demand Biological Safety Level 3 (BSL3) animal facilities. The recently developed bovine BCG challenge model offers a cheaper and faster way to test new vaccine candidates and additionally reduces the severity of the challenge compared to virulent M. bovis challenge in line with the remits of the NC3Rs. In this work we sought to establish the sensitivity of the BCG challenge model by testing a prime boost vaccine regimen that previously increased protection over BCG alone against M. bovis challenge. All animals, except the control group, were vaccinated subcutaneously with BCG Danish, and half of those were then boosted with a recombinant adenoviral vector expressing Antigen 85A, Ad85A. All animals were challenged with BCG Tokyo into the prescapular lymph node and the bacterial load within the lymph nodes was established. All vaccinated animals, independent of the vaccination regimen, cleared BCG significantly faster from the lymph node than control animals, suggesting a protective effect. There was however, no difference between the BCG and the BCG-Ad85A regimens. Additionally, we analysed humoral and cellular immune responses taken prior to challenge for possible predictors of protection. Cultured ELISpot identified significantly higher IFN-ɣ responses in protected vaccinated animals, relative to controls, but not in unprotected vaccinated animals. Furthermore, a trend for protected animals to produce more IFN-ɣ by quantitative PCR and intracellular staining was observed. Thus, this model can also be an attractive alternative to M. bovis challenge models for the discovery of protective biomarkers
KW - bovine BCG challenge model
KW - bovine tuberculosis
KW - Ad85A
KW - BCG Tokyo
KW - intranodal challenge
KW - predictors of protection
KW - Bovine BCG challenge model
KW - Predictors of protection
KW - Bovine tuberculosis
KW - Intranodal challenge
KW - Tuberculosis, Bovine/prevention & control
KW - Mycobacterium bovis/immunology
KW - Lymph Nodes/microbiology
KW - Bacterial Load
KW - Interferon-gamma/immunology
KW - Vaccination/veterinary
KW - Animals
KW - BCG Vaccine/administration & dosage
KW - Cattle
KW - Immunization, Secondary/veterinary
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075883148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 31759733
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 38
SP - 1241
EP - 1248
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 5
ER -