Evaluating Validity and Test-Retest Reliability in Four Drive for Muscularity Questionnaires

D. Tod, Todd G. Morrison, Christian Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study assessed relationships among four commonly used drive for muscularity questionnaires, along with their 7 and 14 day test–retest reliability. Sample 1 was comprised of young British adult males (N = 272; MAGE = 20.3) who completed the questionnaires once. Sample 2, a group of young British adult males (N = 54, MAGE = 19.3), completed the questionnaires three times spaced 7 and 14 days apart. Correlations among Sample 1 ranged from .20 to .82 providing evidence for concurrent and discriminant validities. Evidence for test–retest reliability emerged with intraclass correlations ranging from .78 to .95 (p < .001) and generally nonsignificant t-tests (p > .05). Overall, the data support the psychometric properties of the drive for muscularity inventories; however, the shared variance (35–67%) hints that refinement is possible.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-428
JournalBody Image
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

Keywords

  • Drive for muscularity
  • Body image
  • Psychometrics
  • Concurrent validity
  • Discriminant validity
  • Test–retest reliability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Validity and Test-Retest Reliability in Four Drive for Muscularity Questionnaires'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this