TY - JOUR
T1 - Excuse and Mitigation Under International Criminal Law
T2 - Redrawing Conceptual Boundaries
AU - Olusanya, Olaoluwa
PY - 2010/1/1
Y1 - 2010/1/1
N2 - Since the Nuremberg trials of 1945, the classification of men and women who commit atrocities in time of war has been a subject of bafflement. Attempts to explain this phenomenon have largely relied on various abnormality theories. However, none of these theories hold sway. Instead, the dominant view today is that men and women who commit atrocities are normal. This conclusion has confounded many because it is even harder to rationalize how people who in fact closely resemble us could perpetrate such violent crimes. How had they become evil criminals? The focus on this article is on excuse theory and its value in resolving this issue.
AB - Since the Nuremberg trials of 1945, the classification of men and women who commit atrocities in time of war has been a subject of bafflement. Attempts to explain this phenomenon have largely relied on various abnormality theories. However, none of these theories hold sway. Instead, the dominant view today is that men and women who commit atrocities are normal. This conclusion has confounded many because it is even harder to rationalize how people who in fact closely resemble us could perpetrate such violent crimes. How had they become evil criminals? The focus on this article is on excuse theory and its value in resolving this issue.
KW - criminal law
KW - psychology, sociology
KW - social psychology
KW - war crimes jurisprudence
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/2160/8227
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949769897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1525/nclr.2010.13.1.23
DO - 10.1525/nclr.2010.13.1.23
M3 - Article
SN - 1933-4192
VL - 13
SP - 23
EP - 89
JO - New Criminal Law Review
JF - New Criminal Law Review
IS - 1
ER -
