Failed Securitization: Why It Matters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (SciVal)
1107 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The puzzle motivating this article is the nearly unanimous focus in the literature on successful cases of securitization. The article examines this case selection bias and asks about its consequences for the study of security. Three arguments are offered. First, there is no a priori reason to give preference to successful cases; rather, a full range of outcomes should be explored. Second, paying attention to failed cases of securitization might yield important insights for the processes of securitization as well as desecuritization. Third, taking failed cases seriously can put into broader perspective actors’ abilities to use claims about security to accrue power and advance their political agendas. In short, moving away from the fixation on successful cases of securitization will make possible a fuller understanding of what security is and what it does
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-377
Number of pages13
JournalPolity
Volume51
Issue number2
Early online date20 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • Case selection bias
  • Failed securitization
  • Frequency illusion
  • Process
  • Security

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Failed Securitization: Why It Matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this