TY - JOUR
T1 - Fighting the next pandemic?
T2 - Civil-military collaboration in health emergencies after COVID
AU - McInnes, Colin
N1 - Colin McInnes is a Professor of International Politics in the Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University and research lead for the Academi Heddwch Cymru (the Welsh Peace Institute). He previously held the UNESCO Chair in HIV, AIDS and Security in Africa. His research interests are in global health and especially global health governance and the role of militaries in health delivery, and he has worked with UNESCO, the World Health Organization, The Nuffield Trust and Public Health Wales. He has published widely on global health and is the co-editor of the Oxford Handbook of Global Health Politics.
PY - 2024/2/22
Y1 - 2024/2/22
N2 - Over the past decade, militaries have been highly visible elements in the response to health emergencies and in particular disease outbreaks. Although there has been a long tradition of civil-military collaboration in health, COVID-19 saw an unprecedented worldwide use of militaries which occurred within a permissive environment established by narratives of global health, humanitarian intervention and multi-sectorality. This creates a dilemma that militaries will likely be an important element in responding to a major health emergency, but that this risks not only militarizing health emergencies but the balance between society and the military more generally. Moreover, the response to the COVID pandemic suggested that current emergency planning is often poorly prepared for the use of militaries in health crises, thereby reducing the effectiveness of a response. This article engages with how concerns over the securitization of health have evolved into concerns over militarization, and the question of how militaries might be used effectively in future health emergencies without risking the militarization of health or damaging civil-military relations more widely.
AB - Over the past decade, militaries have been highly visible elements in the response to health emergencies and in particular disease outbreaks. Although there has been a long tradition of civil-military collaboration in health, COVID-19 saw an unprecedented worldwide use of militaries which occurred within a permissive environment established by narratives of global health, humanitarian intervention and multi-sectorality. This creates a dilemma that militaries will likely be an important element in responding to a major health emergency, but that this risks not only militarizing health emergencies but the balance between society and the military more generally. Moreover, the response to the COVID pandemic suggested that current emergency planning is often poorly prepared for the use of militaries in health crises, thereby reducing the effectiveness of a response. This article engages with how concerns over the securitization of health have evolved into concerns over militarization, and the question of how militaries might be used effectively in future health emergencies without risking the militarization of health or damaging civil-military relations more widely.
KW - Covid 19
KW - civil-military relations
KW - securitisation
KW - Militarisation
KW - global health security
M3 - Article
SN - 0020-5850
JO - International Affairs
JF - International Affairs
ER -