Abstract
There are a variety of measures to describe classification performance with respect to different criteria
and they are often represented by numerical values. Psychologists have commented that human beings
can only reasonably manage to process seven or-so items of information at any one time. Hence,
selecting the best classifier amongst a number of alternatives whose performances are represented by
similar numerical values is a difficult problem faced by end users. To alleviate such difficulty, this paper
presents a new method of linguistic evaluation of classifiers performance. In particular, an innovative
notion of fuzzy complex numbers (FCNs) is developed in an effort to represent and aggregate different
evaluation measures conjunctively without necessarily integrating them. Such an approach well maintains
the underlying semantics of different evaluation measures, thereby ensuring that the resulting
ranking scores are readily interpretable and the inference easily explainable. The utility and applicability
of this research are illustrated by means of an experiment which evaluates the performance of
16 classifiers using different benchmark datasets. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is
compared to conventional statistical approach. Experimental results show that the FCN-based
performance evaluation provides an intuitively reliable and consistent means in assisting end users
to make informed choices of available classifiers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1403-1417 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Pattern Recognition |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2011 |