Geographic and epistemic pluralism in the sources of evidence informing international environmental science-policy platforms: Lessons learnt from the IPBES values assessment

Louise Guibrunet, David Gonzalez-Jimenez, Gabriela Arroyo-Robles, Mariana Cantu-Fernandez, Victoria Contreras, Daniela Flores Mendez, Arlen Valeria Ocampo Castrejon, Bosco Lliso, Ana Sofia Monroy-Sais, Tuyeni H. Mwampamba, Unai Pascual, Brigitte Baptiste, Mike Christie, Patricia Balvanera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Non-technical summary This article examines the challenges and opportunities to integrate diverse sources of evidence in assessments produced by international platforms working at the science-policy interface. Diversity (or pluralism) of sources of literature, both in terms of their geographic origin and disciplinary focus, is essential for assessments to inform decision-making across social-ecological contexts. Using the recently completed 'Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature' of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services as a case, we find that significant effort has been dedicated to reviewing diverse literature. We discuss three strategies to expand pluralism in future assessments. Technical summary Representing plural views in science-policy platforms is essential to avoid reproducing geographic and epistemic biases that permeate contemporary scientific knowledge production and synthesis. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has strived to produce assessments that incorporate information from diverse regions and knowledge systems. We explore the geographic and epistemic pluralism of the literature included in the 'Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature' (VA), and the challenges and opportunities to achieve such knowledge pluralism. We applied a bibliometric analysis to the sources of evidence cited in the VA, and reflected on the assessment development process, in which we were directly involved. Our results highlight the success of different strategies developed by VA experts to engage with diverse sources of literature. Still, most evidence was English-language academic literature produced in Western Europe, Canada, and the United States, echoing the prominence of this literature in scientific publication in environmental disciplines. Reflecting on our experiences, we discuss strategies that could further enhance the geographic and epistemic pluralism in the information reviewed for future environmental assessments produced by IPBES and other international science-policy platforms. Social media summary Epistemic and geographic pluralism was partially achieved in IPBES Values Assessment, and can be further enhanced in future assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere36
Number of pages15
JournalGlobal Sustainability
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • ecosystem services
  • planning and design
  • policies
  • politics and governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geographic and epistemic pluralism in the sources of evidence informing international environmental science-policy platforms: Lessons learnt from the IPBES values assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this