Government participation in virtual negotiations: Evidence from IPCC approval sessions

Patrick Bayer*, Lorenzo Crippa, Hannah Hughes, Erlend Hermansen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic challenged global governance in unprecedented ways by requiring intergovernmental meetings to be held online. For the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), this meant that the intergovernmental approval of the key findings of the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) had to be conducted virtually. In this paper, we assess how the move away from face-to-face meetings affected country participation in IPCC approval sessions. Our findings demonstrate that virtual meetings increased the size of member governments’ delegations, but this did not necessarily translate into a greater number of interventions during the approval of the Summary for Policymakers (SPM) as time zone differences reduced engagement levels significantly—particularly for countries from the Pacific, East Asian, and Latin American regions whose delegations often found themselves in IPCC meetings late at night and early in the morning. These results offer initial, empirically robust evidence about what online meetings can and cannot achieve for promoting more inclusive global governance at a time when the IPCC and other organizations reflect on the future use of virtual and hybrid meeting formats.

Original languageEnglish
Article number132
JournalClimatic Change
Volume177
Issue number8
Early online date13 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Covid-19
  • Delegation size
  • Hybrid meetings
  • IPCC approval sessions
  • Sixth assessment report (AR6)
  • Summary for Policymakers (SPM)
  • Time zones
  • Virtual meetings

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Government participation in virtual negotiations: Evidence from IPCC approval sessions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this