Abstract
Most evolutionary algorithms not only throw out insufficiently good solutions, but forget all information they obtained from their evaluation, which reduces their speed from the information theory point of view. An evolutionary algorithm which does not do that, the 1+(λ,β) EA was recently proposed by Doerr, Doerr and Ebel. We evaluate this algorithm on the problem of finding hard tests for maximum flow algorithms. Experiments show that the 1+(λ,β) EA is never the best, but is quite stable. However, its adaptive version, known for being superior for the OneMax problem, is shown to be one of the worst.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | GECCO Companion '15 |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation |
Editors | Sara Silva |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
Pages | 1229-1232 |
Number of pages | 4 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4503-3488-4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Jul 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 16th Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2015 - Madrid, Spain Duration: 11 Jul 2015 → 15 Jul 2015 |
Conference
Conference | 16th Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2015 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Spain |
City | Madrid |
Period | 11 Jul 2015 → 15 Jul 2015 |
Keywords
- black-box complexity
- evolutionary algorithms
- test generation
- worst-case execution time