TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated farm management for sustainable agriculture
T2 - lessons for knowledge exchange and policy
AU - Rose, David
AU - Sutherland, William
AU - Borthwick, Fiona
AU - Ffoulkes, Charles
AU - Hall, Clare
AU - Moorby, Jon
AU - Nicholas-Davies, Phillipa
AU - Twining, Susan
AU - Dicks, Lynn
AU - Barnes, Andrew P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded as part of Defra's Sustainable Intensification Platform (Project Code LM0201) . In addition, WJS was funded by Arcadia , LVD was funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council partly under the Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Sustainability (BESS) programme , grant codes NE/K015419/1 and NE/N014472/1 . We thank the editor and four anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors
PY - 2019/2/28
Y1 - 2019/2/28
N2 - As a response to the environmentally and socially destructive practices of post-war mechanization and intensification, the concept of sustainable agriculture has become prominent in research, policy, and practice. Sustainable agriculture aims to balance the economic, environmental, and social aspects of farming, creating a resilient farming system in the long-term. Over the last few decades, various concepts have been used in research and policy to encourage the adoption of sustainable practices. Within such a congested space, this paper assesses the value of ‘integrated farm management’ as a concept for the promotion of sustainable agriculture. The concept is the subject of renewed policy interest in England and Wales and it is also being promoted in Europe. Previous research, however, has suggested that integrated farm management may not be well understood or widely practised. There are also criticisms that it can be impractical and poorly differentiated from similar ideas. As such, renewed insights are required into how useful the concept might be for encouraging sustainable agriculture. Using a mixed methods approach, we gathered the views of farmers, farm advisors, and industry representatives about integrated farm management in England and Wales, and interpreted these through a theoretical framework to judge the strength of the concept. Overall, the general principles of Integrated Farm Management were found to be coherent and familiar to most of our respondents. However, the concept performed poorly in terms of its resonance, simplicity of message, differentiation from other similar terms and theoretical utility. We reflect on our findings in the context of other ways to promote sustainable agriculture, drawing out messages for policy and knowledge exchange in England and Wales, as well as elsewhere.
AB - As a response to the environmentally and socially destructive practices of post-war mechanization and intensification, the concept of sustainable agriculture has become prominent in research, policy, and practice. Sustainable agriculture aims to balance the economic, environmental, and social aspects of farming, creating a resilient farming system in the long-term. Over the last few decades, various concepts have been used in research and policy to encourage the adoption of sustainable practices. Within such a congested space, this paper assesses the value of ‘integrated farm management’ as a concept for the promotion of sustainable agriculture. The concept is the subject of renewed policy interest in England and Wales and it is also being promoted in Europe. Previous research, however, has suggested that integrated farm management may not be well understood or widely practised. There are also criticisms that it can be impractical and poorly differentiated from similar ideas. As such, renewed insights are required into how useful the concept might be for encouraging sustainable agriculture. Using a mixed methods approach, we gathered the views of farmers, farm advisors, and industry representatives about integrated farm management in England and Wales, and interpreted these through a theoretical framework to judge the strength of the concept. Overall, the general principles of Integrated Farm Management were found to be coherent and familiar to most of our respondents. However, the concept performed poorly in terms of its resonance, simplicity of message, differentiation from other similar terms and theoretical utility. We reflect on our findings in the context of other ways to promote sustainable agriculture, drawing out messages for policy and knowledge exchange in England and Wales, as well as elsewhere.
KW - Integrated farm management
KW - Integrated farming
KW - Integrated farming systems
KW - Integrated pest management
KW - Knowledge exchange
KW - Sustainable agriculture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058556620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0264-8377
VL - 81
SP - 834
EP - 842
JO - Land Use Policy
JF - Land Use Policy
IS - N/A
ER -