TY - CONF
T1 - Interrogating Publics
AU - Fitzgerald, Sharron
N1 - FitzGerald, S. 2008. Interrogating Publics. The Un-Built. 2008 international architecture research events
The Athens Byzantine and Christian Museum
in collaboration with SARCHA (School of ARCHitecture for All)
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The negation contained in the term and practice of the unbuilt throws the law
into a quest for its own limits and limitations. The unbuilt extends
geographically and conceptually in relation to law, and appears in law’s
temporal horizons in ways that can be deeply unsettling for the law. The
proposed symposium aims at unfolding this connection, thereby tapping in
the potential for the law in developing in ways that would include its selfnegation
and doubting.
The unbuilt is seen by the law variously as a promise for future abstaining, a
past gap to be filled, or a present and constant question on legal teleology. In
relation to the law, the unbuilt can appear in its geographical/ architectural
sense as the area to be kept beyond development, the ecological off-limits,
the not-yet developed, or indeed the overdeveloped, in the sense of illegal
settlements, which needs to be rationalised in more or less radical ways
(razing or legalisation being the two extremes of the legal inclusion). In its
metaphorical sense, the unbuilt irks the law from within, a lacuna of potential
legal colonisation, that questions the legal edifice in a foundational manner:
how able is the law to accept the fact that parts of its structure are in need of
development? Even if this can take place without much legitimacy problems,
how is the law to deal with the fact that parts of its structure are to remain
‘unbuilt’ even though they are making their presence felt in a most urgent
way. The connection of law with urban justice, the right to the city,
geographical control and territoriality are all areas in which law is invited to
accept them as ‘unbuilt’ and, hopefully, bind itself to a promise of abstinence
–not as a concession to liberal ideology, but as an understanding of law’s
limited ability to deal with them.
The proposed symposium will target issues such as the above from the dual
perspective of the law and the unbuilt, in its material and metaphorical
dimensions, with the aim at describing and apprehending the structures that
allow for a legal conceptualisation of the unbuilt.
AB - The negation contained in the term and practice of the unbuilt throws the law
into a quest for its own limits and limitations. The unbuilt extends
geographically and conceptually in relation to law, and appears in law’s
temporal horizons in ways that can be deeply unsettling for the law. The
proposed symposium aims at unfolding this connection, thereby tapping in
the potential for the law in developing in ways that would include its selfnegation
and doubting.
The unbuilt is seen by the law variously as a promise for future abstaining, a
past gap to be filled, or a present and constant question on legal teleology. In
relation to the law, the unbuilt can appear in its geographical/ architectural
sense as the area to be kept beyond development, the ecological off-limits,
the not-yet developed, or indeed the overdeveloped, in the sense of illegal
settlements, which needs to be rationalised in more or less radical ways
(razing or legalisation being the two extremes of the legal inclusion). In its
metaphorical sense, the unbuilt irks the law from within, a lacuna of potential
legal colonisation, that questions the legal edifice in a foundational manner:
how able is the law to accept the fact that parts of its structure are in need of
development? Even if this can take place without much legitimacy problems,
how is the law to deal with the fact that parts of its structure are to remain
‘unbuilt’ even though they are making their presence felt in a most urgent
way. The connection of law with urban justice, the right to the city,
geographical control and territoriality are all areas in which law is invited to
accept them as ‘unbuilt’ and, hopefully, bind itself to a promise of abstinence
–not as a concession to liberal ideology, but as an understanding of law’s
limited ability to deal with them.
The proposed symposium will target issues such as the above from the dual
perspective of the law and the unbuilt, in its material and metaphorical
dimensions, with the aim at describing and apprehending the structures that
allow for a legal conceptualisation of the unbuilt.
M3 - Other
ER -