Abstract
A dichotomy in female extrapair copulation (EPC) behavior, with some females seeking EPC and others not, is inferred if the observed distribution of extrapair young (EPY) over broods differs from a random process on the level of individual offspring (binomial, hypergeometrical, or Poisson). A review of the literature shows such null models are virtually always rejected, with often large effect sizes. We formulate an alternative null model, which assumes that 1) the number of EPC has a random (Poisson) distribution across females (broods) and that 2) the probability for an offspring to be of extrapair origin is zero without any EPC and increases with the number of EPC. Our brood-level model can accommodate the bimodality of both zero and medium rates of EPY typically found in empirical data, and fitting our model to EPY production of 7 passerine bird species shows evidence of a nonrandom distribution of EPY in only 2 species. We therefore argue that 1) dichotomy in extrapair mate choice cannot be inferred only from a significant deviation in the observed distribution of EPY from a random process on the level of offspring and that 2) additional empirical work on testing the contrasting critical predictions from the classic and our alternative null models is required.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 895-904 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Behavioral Ecology |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 13 Jul 2007 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Sept 2007 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Extrapair copulation (EPC)
- Likelihood
- Mate choice
- Null model
- Sexual selection