Is it Interesting?: Comparing human and machine judgements on the PETS dataset

David C. Hogg; Hannah Dee

Is it Interesting?: Comparing human and machine judgements on the PETS dataset

David C. Hogg
, Hannah Dee

Department of Computer Science

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper

34 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages	49-55
Number of pages	7
Publication status	Published - 2004

Access to Document

pets2004.pdf

Permanent link

Persistent link

Cite this

@conference{f05ee9d467db4998b77426a830d8c72c,

title = "Is it Interesting?: Comparing human and machine judgements on the PETS dataset",

author = "Hogg, \{David C.\} and Hannah Dee",

note = "Dee, H. M.; Hogg, D. C. Is it Interesting?: Comparing human and machine judgements on the PETS dataset in: Proceedings of the Performance Evaluation of Tracking And Surveillance workshop (PETS2004) at the European Conference on Computer Vision, pp 49-55, Prague, Czech Repubic, 2004.",

year = "2004",

language = "English",

pages = "49--55",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Is it Interesting?: Comparing human and machine judgements on the PETS dataset

AU - Hogg, David C.

AU - Dee, Hannah

N1 - Dee, H. M.; Hogg, D. C. Is it Interesting?: Comparing human and machine judgements on the PETS dataset in: Proceedings of the Performance Evaluation of Tracking And Surveillance workshop (PETS2004) at the European Conference on Computer Vision, pp 49-55, Prague, Czech Repubic, 2004.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

M3 - Paper

SP - 49

EP - 55

ER -