TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘[It] isn’t designed to be assessed how we assess’
T2 - Rethinking assessment for qualification in the context of the implementation of the Curriculum for Wales
AU - Titley, Elizabeth
AU - Davies, Andrew James
AU - Atherton, Stephen
N1 - Funding Information:
This research arises from a PhD study that was part-funded by the School of Education at Aberystwyth University. The authors would like to thank all of the pupils and teachers who participated in this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. The Curriculum Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Educational Research Association
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - This paper reports teacher and learner perspectives on how assessment and reform influences pedagogical practices and behaviours. The research was conducted in a context of policy reform, at a time when Wales’ revised General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) specifications had been implemented, and learners were preparing for their assessments; but, also during the period of debate on the development of Wales’ new curriculum, which has taken a distinct and contrasting position on assessment to the assumptions underlying the reform of Welsh GCSEs implemented from 2015. These data, therefore, offer unique insights into the affordances and limitations of two sharply contrasting systems at a time of considerable change, offering reflections on the current curriculum and its attendant assessment practices, and also a prospective analysis of how the principles embedded in the new curriculum could challenge these existing assumptions and conventions. Findings suggest that teachers and learners currently inhabit an assessment‐driven system, which encourages performative practices in pedagogy and is governed by external accountability; and that these practices are at odds with the principles of assessment articulated in Successful Futures. Consequently, teachers in this study expressed uncertainty about how assessment for certification purposes at GCSE could be compatible with the principles of the Curriculum for Wales.
AB - This paper reports teacher and learner perspectives on how assessment and reform influences pedagogical practices and behaviours. The research was conducted in a context of policy reform, at a time when Wales’ revised General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) specifications had been implemented, and learners were preparing for their assessments; but, also during the period of debate on the development of Wales’ new curriculum, which has taken a distinct and contrasting position on assessment to the assumptions underlying the reform of Welsh GCSEs implemented from 2015. These data, therefore, offer unique insights into the affordances and limitations of two sharply contrasting systems at a time of considerable change, offering reflections on the current curriculum and its attendant assessment practices, and also a prospective analysis of how the principles embedded in the new curriculum could challenge these existing assumptions and conventions. Findings suggest that teachers and learners currently inhabit an assessment‐driven system, which encourages performative practices in pedagogy and is governed by external accountability; and that these practices are at odds with the principles of assessment articulated in Successful Futures. Consequently, teachers in this study expressed uncertainty about how assessment for certification purposes at GCSE could be compatible with the principles of the Curriculum for Wales.
KW - Curriculum for Wales
KW - accountability
KW - assessment
KW - performativity
KW - reform
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084620305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/curj.36
DO - 10.1002/curj.36
M3 - Article
SN - 0958-5176
VL - 31
SP - 303
EP - 316
JO - Curriculum Journal
JF - Curriculum Journal
IS - 2
ER -