Methylphenidate and nicotine focus responding to an informative discrete CS over successive sessions of appetitive conditioning

Helen J. Cassaday, Beate Finger, Rachel Rutter Horsley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methylphenidate (MP) and nicotine would be expected to improve associative learning, though previous evidence suggests that they should reduce the selectivity with which associations are formed. Here we tested their effects on learning the association between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and food (unconditioned stimulus, UCS) in male Wistar rats. The UCS was delivered immediately (0s) following CS offset or after a 10s trace. In addition to the measures of discrete CS conditioning, contextual and trace responding was measured in the inter-trial- and the inter-stimulus-interval, respectively. In all cases, conditioning was measured as nose poking for food. Both MP and nicotine improved the acquisition of discrete cue conditioning. Acquisition was accelerated (compared to saline) under 5 but not 1 mg/kg MP and 0.6, but not 0.4 mg/kg nicotine. In each case, this effect was observed in 0s but not 10s conditioned groups. For comparison, some earlier published data obtained following the same procedure with D-amphetamine were re-analysed in the same way. Amphetamine similarly improved conditioning in the 0s group, in this case at 0.5, but not 1.5 mg/kg. Thus three different dopamine agonists increased the ability to focus responding to CS presentations over successive sessions of appetitive acquisition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)849-859
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Psychopharmacology
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Keywords

  • Methylphenidate
  • Nicotine
  • Appetitive Conditioning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methylphenidate and nicotine focus responding to an informative discrete CS over successive sessions of appetitive conditioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this