Projects per year
Abstract
The body of peer-reviewed papers on enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants is rapidly growing and allows for better estimation of the true effect of each strategy though the use of meta-analysis methods. Here we present the development of an online database of measured methane mitigation strategies called MitiGate, currently comprising 412 papers. The database is accessible through an online user-friendly interface that allows data extraction with various levels of aggregation on one hand and data-uploading for submission to the database allowing for future refinement and updates of mitigation estimates as well as providing easy access to relevant data for integration into modelling efforts or policy recommendations. To demonstrate and verify the usefulness
of the MitiGate database those studies where methane emissions were expressed per unit of intake (293 papers resulting in 845 treatment comparisons) were used in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the current database estimated the effect size of each of the mitigation strategies as well as the associated variance and measure of heterogeneity. Currently, under-representation of certain strategies, geographic regions and long term studies are the main limitations in providing an accurate quantitative estimation of the mitigation potential of each strategy under varying animal production systems. We have thus implemented the facility for researchers to upload meta-data of their peer reviewed research through a simple input form in the hope that MitiGate will grow into a fully inclusive resource for those wishing to model methane mitigation strategies in ruminants.
of the MitiGate database those studies where methane emissions were expressed per unit of intake (293 papers resulting in 845 treatment comparisons) were used in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the current database estimated the effect size of each of the mitigation strategies as well as the associated variance and measure of heterogeneity. Currently, under-representation of certain strategies, geographic regions and long term studies are the main limitations in providing an accurate quantitative estimation of the mitigation potential of each strategy under varying animal production systems. We have thus implemented the facility for researchers to upload meta-data of their peer reviewed research through a simple input form in the hope that MitiGate will grow into a fully inclusive resource for those wishing to model methane mitigation strategies in ruminants.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1166-1174 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
Volume | 572 |
Early online date | 09 Aug 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Dec 2016 |
Keywords
- methane
- greenhouse gas mitigation
- enteric fermentation
- ruminants
- meta-analysis
- Methane
- Greenhouse gas mitigation
- Enteric fermentation
- Ruminants
- Meta-analysis
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Methane/analysis
- Air Pollution/prevention & control
- Animals
- Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods
- Air Pollutants/analysis
- Animal Husbandry
- Livestock
- Databases, Factual
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'MitiGate; an online meta-analysis database for quantification of mitigation strategies for enteric methane emissions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
RSB : Rumen Systems Biology
Kingston-Smith, A. (PI)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
01 Apr 2012 → 31 Mar 2017
Project: Externally funded research