TY - JOUR
T1 - Molecular tools for bathing water assessment in Europe
T2 - Balancing social science research with a rapidly developing environmental science evidence-base
AU - Oliver, David M.
AU - Hanley, Nick D.
AU - Van Niekerk, Melanie
AU - Kay, David
AU - Heathwaite, A. Louise
AU - Rabinovici, Sharyl J. M.
AU - Kinzelman, Julie L.
AU - Fleming, Lora E.
AU - Porter, Jonathan
AU - Shaikh, Sabina
AU - Fish, Rob
AU - Chilton, Sue
AU - Hewitt, Julie
AU - Connolly, Elaine
AU - Cummins, Andy
AU - Glenk, Klaus
AU - Mcphail, Calum
AU - Mcrory, Eric
AU - Mcvittie, Alistair
AU - Giles, Amanna
AU - Roberts, Suzanne
AU - Simpson, Katherine
AU - Tinch, Dugald
AU - Thairs, Ted
AU - Avery, Lisa M.
AU - Vinten, Andy J. A.
AU - Watts, Bill D.
AU - Quilliam, Richard S.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - The use of molecular tools, principally qPCR, versus traditional culture-based methods for quantifying microbial parameters (e.g., Fecal Indicator Organisms) in bathing waters generates considerable ongoing debate at the science–policy interface. Advances in science have allowed the development and application of molecular biological methods for rapid (~2 h) quantification of microbial pollution in bathing and recreational waters. In contrast, culture-based methods can take between 18 and 96 h for sample processing. Thus, molecular tools offer an opportunity to provide a more meaningful statement of microbial risk to water-users by providing near-real-time information enabling potentially more informed decision-making with regard to water-based activities. However, complementary studies concerning the potential costs and benefits of adopting rapid methods as a regulatory tool are in short supply. We report on findings from an international Working Group that examined the breadth of social impacts, challenges, and research opportunities associated with the application of molecular tools to bathing water regulations.
AB - The use of molecular tools, principally qPCR, versus traditional culture-based methods for quantifying microbial parameters (e.g., Fecal Indicator Organisms) in bathing waters generates considerable ongoing debate at the science–policy interface. Advances in science have allowed the development and application of molecular biological methods for rapid (~2 h) quantification of microbial pollution in bathing and recreational waters. In contrast, culture-based methods can take between 18 and 96 h for sample processing. Thus, molecular tools offer an opportunity to provide a more meaningful statement of microbial risk to water-users by providing near-real-time information enabling potentially more informed decision-making with regard to water-based activities. However, complementary studies concerning the potential costs and benefits of adopting rapid methods as a regulatory tool are in short supply. We report on findings from an international Working Group that examined the breadth of social impacts, challenges, and research opportunities associated with the application of molecular tools to bathing water regulations.
KW - bathing water directive
KW - fecal indicator organism
KW - microbial pollution
KW - public perception
KW - recreational water quality
KW - risk communication
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-015-0698-9
DO - 10.1007/s13280-015-0698-9
M3 - Article
SN - 0044-7447
VL - 45
SP - 52
EP - 62
JO - Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment
JF - Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment
IS - 1
ER -