TY - JOUR
T1 - Nature living in, from, with, and as people
T2 - Exploring a mirrored use of the Life Framework of Values
AU - Willemen, Louise
AU - Kenter, Jasper O.
AU - O'Connor, Seb
AU - van Noordwijk, Meine
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful for the comments and critical reflections by Eglee Zent, Barbara Muraca, and Dominic Lenzi on an earlier version, and for the feedback received from two anonymous reviewers, that helped us to sharpen the presented perspectives.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - The Life Frames of Values, recently endorsed by Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, articulate four different ways nature matters to people living in, from, with, and as nature. These frames distinguish value perceptions of, and ways to communicate about, the living world. We look to expand understandings of nature in the Life framework by exploring whether the Life Frames could be mirrored to capture how the more-than-human natural world may relate to people. We explore 1) how nature living in, from, with, and as people could be understood, and 2) whether two-way nature–people value frames add value to the framework and current sustainable development discourse. While ‘living from’ and ‘living with’ can be symmetrical two-way relations, the ‘living in’ and ‘as’ have a directional point of reference. The four ‘mirrored’ frames may contribute meaningful nuances and clarification to the existing framing of people–nature relations, while raising questions for further exploration in science and policy.
AB - The Life Frames of Values, recently endorsed by Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, articulate four different ways nature matters to people living in, from, with, and as nature. These frames distinguish value perceptions of, and ways to communicate about, the living world. We look to expand understandings of nature in the Life framework by exploring whether the Life Frames could be mirrored to capture how the more-than-human natural world may relate to people. We explore 1) how nature living in, from, with, and as people could be understood, and 2) whether two-way nature–people value frames add value to the framework and current sustainable development discourse. While ‘living from’ and ‘living with’ can be symmetrical two-way relations, the ‘living in’ and ‘as’ have a directional point of reference. The four ‘mirrored’ frames may contribute meaningful nuances and clarification to the existing framing of people–nature relations, while raising questions for further exploration in science and policy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165255192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101317
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101317
M3 - Review Article
AN - SCOPUS:85165255192
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 63
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
M1 - 101317
ER -