TY - JOUR
T1 - Negativity
T2 - Space, politics, and affects
AU - Dekeyser, Thomas
AU - Secor, Anna
AU - Rose, Mitch
AU - Bissell, David
AU - Zhang, Vickie
AU - Romanillos, JL
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Thomas Dekeyser is supported by a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship (award number: PF19_100052).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - This paper reflects on the status of ‘negativity’ in contemporary social and geographical thought. Based on a panel discussion held at the American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting 2021, each contributor discusses what negativity means to them, and considers its various legacies and potential future trajectories. Along the way, the contributors offer ways of attending to negative spaces (voids, abysses, absences), affects (vulnerabilities, sad passions, incapacities, mortality) and politics (impasses, refusals, irreparabilities). However, rather than defining negativity narrowly, the paper stays with the diversity of work on negativity being undertaken by geographers and other scholars, discussing how varying perspectives expand or dismantle particular elements within spatial theory. Collectively, the contributors argue for paying attention to negativity as the faltering, failure or impossibility of relations between body and world, thus situating it in conversation with relational thought, vitalist philosophies and affirmative ethics.
AB - This paper reflects on the status of ‘negativity’ in contemporary social and geographical thought. Based on a panel discussion held at the American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting 2021, each contributor discusses what negativity means to them, and considers its various legacies and potential future trajectories. Along the way, the contributors offer ways of attending to negative spaces (voids, abysses, absences), affects (vulnerabilities, sad passions, incapacities, mortality) and politics (impasses, refusals, irreparabilities). However, rather than defining negativity narrowly, the paper stays with the diversity of work on negativity being undertaken by geographers and other scholars, discussing how varying perspectives expand or dismantle particular elements within spatial theory. Collectively, the contributors argue for paying attention to negativity as the faltering, failure or impossibility of relations between body and world, thus situating it in conversation with relational thought, vitalist philosophies and affirmative ethics.
KW - affect
KW - affirmation
KW - negativity
KW - relationality
KW - vitalism
KW - vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119379104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/14744740211058080
DO - 10.1177/14744740211058080
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85119379104
SN - 1474-4740
VL - 29
SP - 5
EP - 21
JO - Cultural Geographies
JF - Cultural Geographies
IS - 1
ER -