TY - GEN
T1 - On optimal static and dynamic parameter choices for fixed-target optimization
AU - Vinokurov, Dmitry
AU - Buzdalov, Maxim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 ACM.
PY - 2022/7/8
Y1 - 2022/7/8
N2 - Various flavours of parameter setting, such as (static) parameter tuning and (dynamic) parameter control, receive a lot of attention both in applications and in theoretical investigations. It is widely acknowledged that the choice of parameter values influences the efficiency of evolutionary algorithms (and other search heuristics) a lot, and a considerable amount of work has been dedicated to finding (near-)optimal choices of parameters, or of parameter control strategies. It is perhaps surprising that all the recent theoretic attempts aim at making smaller the time needed to reach the optimum, whereas in most practical settings we may only hope to reach certain realistic fitness targets. One of the ways to close this gap is to study static and dynamic parameter choices in fixed-target settings, and to understand how these choices are different from those tuned towards reaching the optimum. In this paper we investigate some of these settings, using a mixture of exact theory-driven computations and experimental evaluation, and find few remarkably generic trends, some of which may explain a number of misconceptions found in evolutionary computation.
AB - Various flavours of parameter setting, such as (static) parameter tuning and (dynamic) parameter control, receive a lot of attention both in applications and in theoretical investigations. It is widely acknowledged that the choice of parameter values influences the efficiency of evolutionary algorithms (and other search heuristics) a lot, and a considerable amount of work has been dedicated to finding (near-)optimal choices of parameters, or of parameter control strategies. It is perhaps surprising that all the recent theoretic attempts aim at making smaller the time needed to reach the optimum, whereas in most practical settings we may only hope to reach certain realistic fitness targets. One of the ways to close this gap is to study static and dynamic parameter choices in fixed-target settings, and to understand how these choices are different from those tuned towards reaching the optimum. In this paper we investigate some of these settings, using a mixture of exact theory-driven computations and experimental evaluation, and find few remarkably generic trends, some of which may explain a number of misconceptions found in evolutionary computation.
KW - fixed-target analysis
KW - parameter control
KW - parameter tuning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135239115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3512290.3528875
DO - 10.1145/3512290.3528875
M3 - Conference Proceeding (Non-Journal item)
AN - SCOPUS:85135239115
T3 - GECCO 2022 - Proceedings of the 2022 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
SP - 876
EP - 883
BT - Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 2022 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2022
Y2 - 9 July 2022 through 13 July 2022
ER -