TY - JOUR
T1 - On the accuracy of glacier outlines derived from remote-sensing data
AU - Paul, F.
AU - Barrand, N. E.
AU - Baumann, S.
AU - Berthier, E.
AU - Bolch, T.
AU - Casey, K.
AU - Frey, H.
AU - Joshi, S. P.
AU - Konovalov, V.
AU - Le Bris, R.
AU - Mölg, N.
AU - Nosenko, G.
AU - Nuth, C.
AU - Pope, A.
AU - Racoviteanu, A.
AU - Rastner, P.
AU - Raup, B.
AU - Scharrer, K.
AU - Steffen, S.
AU - Winsvold, S.
PY - 2013/7/1
Y1 - 2013/7/1
N2 - Deriving glacier outlines from satellite data has become increasingly popular in the past decade. In particular when glacier outlines are used as a base for change assessment, it is important to know how accurate they are. Calculating the accuracy correctly is challenging, as appropriate reference data (e.g. from higher-resolution sensors) are seldom available. Moreover, after the required manual correction of the raw outlines (e.g. for debris cover), such a comparison would only reveal the accuracy of the analyst rather than of the algorithm applied. Here we compare outlines for clean and debriscovered glaciers, as derived from single and multiple digitizing by different or the same analysts on very high- (1 m) and medium-resolution (30 m) remote-sensing data, against each other and to glacier outlines derived from automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Results show a high variability in the interpretation of debris-covered glacier parts, largely independent of the spatial resolution (area differences were up to 30%), and an overall good agreement for clean ice with sufficient contrast to the surrounding terrain (differences ̃5%). The differences of the automatically derived outlines from a reference value are as small as the standard deviation of the manual digitizations from several analysts. Based on these results, we conclude that automated mapping of clean ice is preferable to manual digitization and recommend using the latter method only for required corrections of incorrectly mapped glacier parts (e.g. debris cover, shadow).
AB - Deriving glacier outlines from satellite data has become increasingly popular in the past decade. In particular when glacier outlines are used as a base for change assessment, it is important to know how accurate they are. Calculating the accuracy correctly is challenging, as appropriate reference data (e.g. from higher-resolution sensors) are seldom available. Moreover, after the required manual correction of the raw outlines (e.g. for debris cover), such a comparison would only reveal the accuracy of the analyst rather than of the algorithm applied. Here we compare outlines for clean and debriscovered glaciers, as derived from single and multiple digitizing by different or the same analysts on very high- (1 m) and medium-resolution (30 m) remote-sensing data, against each other and to glacier outlines derived from automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Results show a high variability in the interpretation of debris-covered glacier parts, largely independent of the spatial resolution (area differences were up to 30%), and an overall good agreement for clean ice with sufficient contrast to the surrounding terrain (differences ̃5%). The differences of the automatically derived outlines from a reference value are as small as the standard deviation of the manual digitizations from several analysts. Based on these results, we conclude that automated mapping of clean ice is preferable to manual digitization and recommend using the latter method only for required corrections of incorrectly mapped glacier parts (e.g. debris cover, shadow).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881653579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3189/2013AoG63A296
DO - 10.3189/2013AoG63A296
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84881653579
SN - 0260-3055
VL - 54
SP - 171
EP - 182
JO - Annals of Glaciology
JF - Annals of Glaciology
IS - 63
ER -