TY - JOUR
T1 - Organic Public Geographies: 'Making the Connection'
AU - Mitchell, Tyler
AU - Lovell, Tom
AU - Askins, Kye
AU - Fuller, Duncan
AU - Roberts, Margaret
AU - Flaxman, Pete
AU - Gordon, Linzi
AU - Rothnie, Gail
AU - Robinson, Guy
AU - Hawkins, Harriet
AU - Wheeldon, Rachel
AU - Griffiths, Helen
AU - Murphy, Claire
AU - Cook, Ian
AU - Sacks, Shelley
AU - Swift, Di
AU - Rawling, Eleanor
AU - Evans, James
AU - Allen, Daniel
AU - Prescott, Heather
AU - Wilson, Jacky
AU - Williams, Alice
AU - Feenay, Katie
N1 - Hawkins, H., Sacks, S., Cook, I., Rawling, E., Griffiths, H., Swift, D., Evans, J., Rothnie, G., Wilson, J., Williams, A., Feenay, K., Gordon, K., Prescott, H., Murphy, C., Alen, D., Mitchell, T., Wheeldon, R., Roberts, M., robinson, G., Flaxman, P., Fuller, D., Lovell, T., Askins, K. (2011). Organic Public Geographies: 'Making the Connection'. Antipode, 43 (4), 909-926.
PY - 2011/10/27
Y1 - 2011/10/27
N2 - A new field of 'public geographies' is taking shape (Fuller 2008) in geography's mainstream journals. While much is 'traditional', with intellectuals disseminating academic research via non-academic outlets (Castree 2006; Mitchell 2008; Oslender 2007), less visible is the 'organic' work and its 'more involved intellectualizing, pursued through working with area-based or single-interest groups, in which the process itself may be the outcome' (Ward 2006: 499; see Fuller and Askins 2010). A number of well-known projects exist where research has been 'done not merely for the people we write about but with them' (Gregory 2005: 188; see also Cahill 2004; Johnston and Pratt 2010). However, collaborative writing of academic publications which gives research participants authorial credit is unusual (mrs kinpainsby 2008; although see Sangtin Writers and Nagar 2006). This paper is about an organic public geographies project called 'Making the connection'. It is written by a diverse collection of (non-) academic participants who contributed to the project before it had started, as it was undertaken, and/or after it had finished. This is a 'messy', process-oriented text (Cook et al. 2007) working through the threads (partially) connecting the activities of its main collaborators, including a referee who helped get the paper to publication.
AB - A new field of 'public geographies' is taking shape (Fuller 2008) in geography's mainstream journals. While much is 'traditional', with intellectuals disseminating academic research via non-academic outlets (Castree 2006; Mitchell 2008; Oslender 2007), less visible is the 'organic' work and its 'more involved intellectualizing, pursued through working with area-based or single-interest groups, in which the process itself may be the outcome' (Ward 2006: 499; see Fuller and Askins 2010). A number of well-known projects exist where research has been 'done not merely for the people we write about but with them' (Gregory 2005: 188; see also Cahill 2004; Johnston and Pratt 2010). However, collaborative writing of academic publications which gives research participants authorial credit is unusual (mrs kinpainsby 2008; although see Sangtin Writers and Nagar 2006). This paper is about an organic public geographies project called 'Making the connection'. It is written by a diverse collection of (non-) academic participants who contributed to the project before it had started, as it was undertaken, and/or after it had finished. This is a 'messy', process-oriented text (Cook et al. 2007) working through the threads (partially) connecting the activities of its main collaborators, including a referee who helped get the paper to publication.
M3 - Article
SN - 0066-4812
SP - 909
EP - 926
JO - Antipode
JF - Antipode
ER -