Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science

Georg Steinhauser*, Wolfram Adlassnig, Jesaka Ahau Risch, Serena Anderlini, Petros Arguriou, Aaron Zolen Armendariz, William Bains, Clark Baker, Martin Barnes, Jonathan Barnett, Michael Baumgartner, Thomas Baumgartner, Charles A. Bendall, Yvonne S. Bender, Max Bichler, Teresa Biermann, Ronaldo Bini, Eduardo Blanco, John Bleau, Anthony BrinkDarin Brown, Christopher Burghuber, Roy Calne, Brian Carter, Cesar Castano, Peter Celec, Maria Eugenia Celis, Nicky Clarke, David Cockrell, David Collins, Brian Coogan, Jennifer Craig, Cal Crilly, David Crowe, Antonei B. Csoka, Chaza Darwich, Topiciprin Del Kebos, Michele DeRinaldi, Bongani Dlamini, Tomasz Drewa, Michael Dwyer, Fabienne Eder, Raul Ehrichs De Palma, Dean Esmay, Catherine Evans Ro Tt, Christopher Exley, Robin Falkov, Celia Ingrid Farber, William Fearn, Nicholas J.G. Pearce

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Social Sciences

Psychology

Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Medicine and Dentistry