Periodic vs. molecular cluster approaches to resolving glass structure and properties: Anorthite a case study

Kun V.. Tian, Mustafa Z. Mahmoud, Paola Cozza, Silvia Licoccia, De-Cai Fang, Devis Di Tommaso, Gregory A. Chass, G. Neville Greaves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Periodic and molecular cluster models are presented for anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8), a cement forming glass with desirable thermal and mechanical properties also tested in dental applications. Both the crystalline and amorphous structures were characterised by ab initio molecular dynamics and found to be in good agreement with experiment. Additional investigations of the elongation and fracture of the glass were also made. The recovery of material properties signaled the failure of the periodic method to generate acceptable fracture surfaces to model cement forming-sites. Isolated molecular cluster models of anorthite were therefore investigated with electronic structure methods and showed sound structural matches with the traditional periodic structures. The equilibrated glass clusters were used to develop cement models, through binding of short acid oligomers to selected Al-centres, simulating the glass-polymer interface. Overall, the anorthite glass structures emerging from periodic and cluster models were in close agreement. Results suggest that bare molecular cluster models represent an alternative avenue for accurately investigating amorphous systems, providing more realistic descriptions of edge and corner sites, as well as interfaces.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-145
JournalJournal of Non-Crystalline Solids
Volume451
Early online date07 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • anorthite
  • cement
  • Ab initio molecular dynamics
  • cluster model
  • EXAFS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Periodic vs. molecular cluster approaches to resolving glass structure and properties: Anorthite a case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this