TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling:
T2 - A CASP-CAPRI experiment
AU - Lensink, Marc F.
AU - Velankar, Sameer
AU - Kryshtafovych, Andriy
AU - Huang, Shen-you
AU - Schneidman-Duhovny, Dina
AU - Sali, Andrej
AU - Segura, Joan
AU - Fernandez-fuentes, Narcis
AU - Viswanath, Shruthi
AU - Elber, Ron
AU - Grudinin, Sergei
AU - Popov, Petr
AU - Neveu, Emilie
AU - Lee, Hasup
AU - Baek, Minkyung
AU - Park, Sangwoo
AU - Heo, Lim
AU - Rie Lee, Gyu
AU - Seok, Chaok
AU - Qin, Sanbo
AU - Zhou, Huan-xiang
AU - Ritchie, David W.
AU - Maigret, Bernard
AU - Devignes, Marie-Dominique
AU - Ghoorah, Anisah
AU - Torchala, Mieczyslaw
AU - Chaleil, Raphaël A. G.
AU - Bates, Paul A.
AU - Ben-Zeev, Efrat
AU - Eisenstein, Miriam
AU - Negi, Surendra S.
AU - Weng, Zhiping
AU - Vreven, Thom
AU - Pierce, Brian G.
AU - Borrman, Tyler M.
AU - Yu, Jinchao
AU - Ochsenbein, Françoise
AU - Guerois, Raphaël
AU - Vangone, Anna
AU - Rodrigues, João P. G. L. M.
AU - Van Zundert, Gydo
AU - Nellen, Mehdi
AU - Xue, Li
AU - Karaca, Ezgi
AU - Melquiond, Adrien S.j.
AU - Visscher, Koen
AU - Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
AU - Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
AU - Xu, Xianjin
AU - Qiu, Liming
PY - 2016/9/20
Y1 - 2016/9/20
N2 - We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP‐CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein–protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact‐sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology‐built subunit models and the smaller pair‐wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):323–348. © 2016 The Authors Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
AB - We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP‐CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein–protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact‐sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology‐built subunit models and the smaller pair‐wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):323–348. © 2016 The Authors Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
KW - CAPRI
KW - CASP
KW - oligomer state
KW - blind prediction
KW - protein interaction
KW - protein docking
U2 - 10.1002/prot.25007
DO - 10.1002/prot.25007
M3 - Article
SN - 0887-3585
VL - 84
SP - 323
EP - 348
JO - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
JF - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
IS - S1
ER -