Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: Challenging core assumptions

Jen Iris Allan*, Anwesha Borthakur, Fiona Kinninburgh, Moritz Petersmann, Angeliki Balayannis, Andrew Barry, Silke Beck, Kevin Elliott, Tim Forsyth, Anita Hardon, Hannah Hughes, Philip Macnaghten, Henrik Selin, Yixian Sun, Alice Vadrot

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Negotiations are ongoing but fraught for designing a new global science-policy panel for chemicals and waste pollution. In this Perspectives article, we challenge three assumptions guiding these negotiations. First, the new panel should resemble the existing panels of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Second, the creation of a new panel will automatically carry authority within policymaking. Third, the participation of industry is crucial without special consideration for its interests. Further, we identify three steps to enhance the panel's relevance and influence.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102995
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume92
Early online date08 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 08 Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Chemicals
  • IPBES
  • IPCC
  • Science-policy interface
  • Waste

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: Challenging core assumptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this