TY - CONF
T1 - River readings: the environmental knowledge-practices of angling
AU - Bear, Christopher
AU - Eden, Sally
N1 - Bear C, Eden S. 2009. River Readings: the environmental knowledge-practices of angling. Living Landscapes Conference, Aberystwyth University, 18 June 2009.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - This paper is about the ways in which anglers read rivers as landscapes, as contexts and
as places in which they develop their own knowledge-practices and also coproduce water
environments. Drawing on semi-structured interviews and participant observation
conducted with anglers who fish on the Rivers Swale, Ure and Esk in northern England
between 2006-2008, it considers how supposedly ‘lay’ people develop skills of
environmental interpretation, mental mapping and modelling, visual and nonvisual sensing
and sense-making through being part of a rapidly changing and diverse environment.
Through this, it emphasises that humans and nonhumans are intimately and relationally
connected through their everyday, even mundane, environmental knowledge-practices. It
shows that the ways in which anglers read rivers matters. First, it demonstrates how bodies
in environments coevolve in multiple sensory contexts. Second, anglers’ readings are also
put to work in terms of physical environmental management and construction, as well as
political environmental campaigning and tenure patterns. Third, their readings are often
neglected in favour of the representation of the public as ‘lay’ – as unspecialised, often
ignorant, commonly powerless and tragically disconnected from ‘nature’.
AB - This paper is about the ways in which anglers read rivers as landscapes, as contexts and
as places in which they develop their own knowledge-practices and also coproduce water
environments. Drawing on semi-structured interviews and participant observation
conducted with anglers who fish on the Rivers Swale, Ure and Esk in northern England
between 2006-2008, it considers how supposedly ‘lay’ people develop skills of
environmental interpretation, mental mapping and modelling, visual and nonvisual sensing
and sense-making through being part of a rapidly changing and diverse environment.
Through this, it emphasises that humans and nonhumans are intimately and relationally
connected through their everyday, even mundane, environmental knowledge-practices. It
shows that the ways in which anglers read rivers matters. First, it demonstrates how bodies
in environments coevolve in multiple sensory contexts. Second, anglers’ readings are also
put to work in terms of physical environmental management and construction, as well as
political environmental campaigning and tenure patterns. Third, their readings are often
neglected in favour of the representation of the public as ‘lay’ – as unspecialised, often
ignorant, commonly powerless and tragically disconnected from ‘nature’.
M3 - Abstract
ER -