Using the case study of South Africa, this article examines how influential outsider states perceive the legitimacy of the UN Security Council and whether they can perform a critical role in affecting the legitimacy of the institution. The article demonstrates that South Africa’s reform diplomacy challenges the authority of the existing membership of the Council but not the legitimacy of the original mandate of the Council as the guarantor of international peace and stability. Such a reform agenda allows for promoting South Africa’s own candidacy as a new permanent member of the Council. Despite its activism in promoting such reform, South Africa’s diplomacy is undermined by its incapacity to influence the positions of the permanent five members, the lack of support by other African states, and its own ambivalent foreign policy that oscillates between support for human rights and allegiance to the global South.
|Number of pages||22|
|Early online date||26 Jul 2016|
|Publication status||Published - 01 Sept 2016|
- South Africa
- UN Security Council
- global governance
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'South Africa's Reform Diplomacy and the Legitimacy of the UN Security Council'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Department of International Politics - Lecturer in International Politics of the Newly Emergent Powers & the Global Order
Person: Teaching And Research