Abstract
This article takes as its point of departure a series of anecdotes, written roughly between c.1200 and c.1270, about the election of Frederick Barbarossa as king of the Romans and emperor-elect in 1152. They represent Frederick as using an artful ruse to obtain the throne, or as a usurper. They are of limited value for reconstructing the events of 1152. Yet the frequency and spread of the accounts – with examples to be found in France and North Africa, as well as Germany – as well as striking similarities between them, raise important questions about historical memory in thirteenth-century Europe. In addition, a strict emphasis in the German materials on hereditary norms of succession marks a striking contrast with contemporary realities, and thus points to a profound dissonance between political norms and political realities in later Staufen Germany.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 295-317 |
| Journal | Journal of Medieval History |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2012 |
Keywords
- Frederick Barbarossa
- Staufen Germany (1138–1268)
- historical writing
- political culture
- kingship
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tales of Trickery and Deceit: the election of Frederick Barbarossa (1152), historical memory, and the culture of kingship in later Staufen Germany'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver