Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being

Chris Dawson, Michael Veliziotis, Benjamin Hopkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Citations (SciVal)


This article is concerned with whether employees on temporary contracts in Britain report lower well-being than those on permanent contracts, and whether this relationship is mediated by differences in dimensions of job satisfaction. Previous research has identified a well-being gap between permanent and temporary employees but has not addressed what individual and contract specific characteristics contribute to this observed difference. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey, the article finds that a large proportion of the difference in self-reported well-being between permanent and temporary employees appears to be explained by differences in satisfaction with job security. Other dimensions of job satisfaction are found to be less important. In fact, after controlling for differences in satisfaction with security, the results suggest that temporary employees report higher psychological well-being and life satisfaction. This indicates that an employment contract characterized by a definite duration lowers individual well-being principally through heightened job insecurity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-98
Number of pages30
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
Issue number1
Early online date17 Dec 2014
Publication statusPublished - 01 Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this