TY - JOUR
T1 - The 17 April 2021 widespread solar energetic particle event
AU - Dresing, N.
AU - Rodríguez-García, L.
AU - Jebaraj, I. C.
AU - Warmuth, A.
AU - Wallace, S.
AU - Balmaceda, L.
AU - Podladchikova, T.
AU - Strauss, R. D.
AU - Kouloumvakos, A.
AU - Palmroos, C.
AU - Krupar, V.
AU - Gieseler, J.
AU - Xu, Z.
AU - Mitchell, J. G.
AU - Cohen, C. M.S.
AU - De Nolfo, G. A.
AU - Palmerio, E.
AU - Carcaboso, F.
AU - Kilpua, E. K.J.
AU - Trotta, D.
AU - Auster, U.
AU - Asvestari, E.
AU - Da Silva, D.
AU - Dröge, W.
AU - Getachew, T.
AU - Gómez-Herrero, R.
AU - Grande, M.
AU - Heyner, D.
AU - Holmström, M.
AU - Huovelin, J.
AU - Kartavykh, Y.
AU - Laurenza, M.
AU - Lee, C. O.
AU - Mason, G.
AU - Maksimovic, M.
AU - Mieth, J.
AU - Murakami, G.
AU - Oleynik, P.
AU - Pinto, M.
AU - Pulupa, M.
AU - Richter, I.
AU - Rodríguez-Pacheco, J.
AU - Sánchez-Cano, B.
AU - Schuller, F.
AU - Ueno, H.
AU - Vainio, R.
AU - Vecchio, A.
AU - Veronig, A. M.
AU - Wijsen, N.
N1 - Funding Information:
Solar Orbiter is a space mission of international collaboration between ESA and NASA, operated by ESA. The STIX instrument is an international collaboration between Switzerland, Poland, France, Czech Republic, Germany, Austria, Ireland, and Italy. We acknowledge funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreements No. 101004159 (SERPENTINE), and No. 870405 (EUHFORIA 2.0). BepiColombo is a joint ESA–JAXA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and JAXA. Parker Solar Probe was designed, built, and is now operated by the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory as part of NASA’s Living with a Star (LWS) program (contract NNN06AA01C). Support from the LWS management and technical team has played a critical role in the success of the Parker Solar Probe mission. Work in the University of Turku was performed under the umbrella of Finnish Centre of Excellence in Research of Sustainable Space (Academy of Finland Grant No. 336809). N.D. is grateful for support by the Turku Collegium for Science, Medicine and Technology of the University of Turku, Finland. N.D. and I.C.J. are grateful for support by the Academy of Finland (SHOCKSEE, grant No. 346902). L.R.G. thanks Toni Galvin for her assistance in the use of STEREO/PLASTIC data and Leila Mays, Dusan Odstrcil, Nick Arge, and Shaela Jones-Mecholsky regarding the use of WSA-ENLIL model. The UAH team acknowledges the financial support by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades FEDER/MCIU/AEI Projects ESP2017-88436-R and PID2019-104863RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. I.C.J. acknowledges funding by the BRAIN-be project SWiM (Solar Wind Modelling with EUHFORIA for the new heliospheric missions). A.K. acknowledges support from NASA’s NNN06AA01C (SO-SIS Phase-E) contract. V.K. acknowledges the support by NASA under grants No. 18-2HSWO218_2-0010 and 19-HSR-19_2-0143. E.P. acknowledges support from NASA’s PSP-GI (grant No. 80NSSC22K0349), O2R (grant No. 80NSSC20K0285), and LWS-SC (grant No. 80NSSC22K0893) programmes. E.A. acknowledges support from the Academy of Finland (Postdoctoral Researcher Grant 322455). W.D. and Y.K. acknowledge ISSI for the possibility to discuss the questions related to particle propagation in interplanetary space during the meeting of the team No. 459 (led by G. Li and L. Wang). B.S.-C. acknowledges support through UK-STFC Ernest Rutherford Fellowship ST/V004115/1 and STFC grant ST/V000209/1. The work of F.S. was supported by DLR grant No. 50 OT 1904. N.W. acknowledges support from NASA program NNH17ZDA001N-LWS and from the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen, fellowship No. 1184319N). C.O.L. acknowledges support from NASA’s LWS Program (Grant No. 80NSSC21K1325) and the MAVEN project funded through the NASA Mars Exploration Program. C.O.L. and C.M.S.C. acknowledge support from the IMPACT Investigation by the NASA Heliophysics Division through the STEREO Project Office at NASA GSFC (Grant No. 80NSSC18K1446). M.L. acknowledges support from the Italian Space Agency and the National Institute of Astrophysics through the ASI-INAF n. 2020-35-HH.0 agreement for the development of the ASPIS prototype of scientific data centre for Space Weather. ENLIL simulation results have been provided by the CCMC at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) through their public Runs on Request system ( http://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov ; run ID Laura_Rodriguez-Garcia_041322_SH_1). The WSA model was developed by N. Arge, currently at GSFC, and the ENLIL Model was developed by D. Odstrcil, currently at George Mason University.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors 2023.
PY - 2023/6/9
Y1 - 2023/6/9
N2 - Context. A complex and long-lasting solar eruption on 17 April 2021 produced a widespread solar energetic particle (SEP) event that was observed by five longitudinally well-separated observers in the inner heliosphere that covered distances to the Sun from 0.42 to 1 au: BepiColombo, Parker Solar Probe, Solar Orbiter, STEREO A, and near-Earth spacecraft. The event was the second widespread SEP event detected in solar cycle 25, and it produced relativistic electrons and protons. It was associated with a long-lasting solar hard X-ray flare that showed multiple hard X-ray peaks over a duration of one hour. The event was further accompanied by a medium-fast coronal mass ejection (CME) with a speed of 880 km s−1 that drove a shock, an extreme ultraviolet wave, and long-lasting and complex radio burst activity that showed four distinct type III burst groups over a period of 40 min.Aims. We aim to understand the reason for the wide spread of elevated SEP intensities in the inner heliosphere as well as identify the underlying source regions of the observed energetic electrons and protons.Methods. We applied a comprehensive multi-spacecraft analysis of remote-sensing observations and in situ measurements of the energetic particles and interplanetary context to attribute the SEP observations at the different locations to the various potential source regions at the Sun. We used an ENLIL simulation to characterize the complex interplanetary state and its role in the energetic particle transport. The magnetic connection between each spacecraft and the Sun was determined using ballistic backmapping in combination with potential field source surface extrapolations in the lower corona. Using also a reconstruction of the coronal shock front, we then determined the times when the shock establishes magnetic connections with the different observers. Radio observations were used to characterize the directivity of the four main injection episodes, which were then employed in a 2D SEP transport simulation to test the importance of these different injection episodes.Results. A comprehensive timing analysis of the inferred solar injection times of the SEPs observed at each spacecraft suggests different source processes being important for the electron and proton events. Comparison among the characteristics and timing of the potential particle sources, such as the CME-driven shock or the flare, suggests a stronger shock contribution for the proton event and a more likely flare-related source for the electron event.Conclusions. In contrast to earlier studies on widespread SEP events, we find that in this event an important ingredient for the wide SEP spread was the wide longitudinal range of about 110° covered by distinct SEP injections, which is also supported by our SEP transport modeling.
AB - Context. A complex and long-lasting solar eruption on 17 April 2021 produced a widespread solar energetic particle (SEP) event that was observed by five longitudinally well-separated observers in the inner heliosphere that covered distances to the Sun from 0.42 to 1 au: BepiColombo, Parker Solar Probe, Solar Orbiter, STEREO A, and near-Earth spacecraft. The event was the second widespread SEP event detected in solar cycle 25, and it produced relativistic electrons and protons. It was associated with a long-lasting solar hard X-ray flare that showed multiple hard X-ray peaks over a duration of one hour. The event was further accompanied by a medium-fast coronal mass ejection (CME) with a speed of 880 km s−1 that drove a shock, an extreme ultraviolet wave, and long-lasting and complex radio burst activity that showed four distinct type III burst groups over a period of 40 min.Aims. We aim to understand the reason for the wide spread of elevated SEP intensities in the inner heliosphere as well as identify the underlying source regions of the observed energetic electrons and protons.Methods. We applied a comprehensive multi-spacecraft analysis of remote-sensing observations and in situ measurements of the energetic particles and interplanetary context to attribute the SEP observations at the different locations to the various potential source regions at the Sun. We used an ENLIL simulation to characterize the complex interplanetary state and its role in the energetic particle transport. The magnetic connection between each spacecraft and the Sun was determined using ballistic backmapping in combination with potential field source surface extrapolations in the lower corona. Using also a reconstruction of the coronal shock front, we then determined the times when the shock establishes magnetic connections with the different observers. Radio observations were used to characterize the directivity of the four main injection episodes, which were then employed in a 2D SEP transport simulation to test the importance of these different injection episodes.Results. A comprehensive timing analysis of the inferred solar injection times of the SEPs observed at each spacecraft suggests different source processes being important for the electron and proton events. Comparison among the characteristics and timing of the potential particle sources, such as the CME-driven shock or the flare, suggests a stronger shock contribution for the proton event and a more likely flare-related source for the electron event.Conclusions. In contrast to earlier studies on widespread SEP events, we find that in this event an important ingredient for the wide SEP spread was the wide longitudinal range of about 110° covered by distinct SEP injections, which is also supported by our SEP transport modeling.
KW - Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
KW - Sun: flares
KW - Sun: heliosphere
KW - Sun: particle emission
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163207520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/202345938
DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/202345938
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163207520
SN - 0004-6361
VL - 674
JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics
JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics
M1 - A105
ER -