The Centrality of ‘Guilt’ in Youth Justice: Conceptualising Child ‘Guilt’ for Child First Justice

Kathy Hampson*, Stephen Case, Roger Smith, Rosemary Toll

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Children are extremely vulnerable yet often treated as adults, measured by adult-centric conceptualisations of ‘guilt’ and expected to decide on their own culpability for law infringement. In addition, system agents incentivise children to admit guilt by offering contingent support or implying further consequences for refusal, resulting in a youth justice system that exacerbates this by requiring admissions of guilt throughout the process. We explore difficulties of applying adult-centric understandings of ‘guilt’ to children through our typology of guilt, which examines responses children might give to questions of guilt and asks whether applying adult-centric notions of guilt erodes ‘Child First’ youth justice.
Original languageEnglish
Article number14732254251369847
Number of pages21
JournalYouth Justice
Early online date02 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 02 Oct 2025

Keywords

  • Child First
  • children
  • guilt
  • responsibility
  • youth justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Centrality of ‘Guilt’ in Youth Justice: Conceptualising Child ‘Guilt’ for Child First Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this